BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Henry Lam

Henry Lam contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine Learningmath.OCMethodologymath.STStatistics Theorymath.PRComputationRobotics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
15works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

15 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Subsampled Ensemble Can Improve Generalization Tail Exponentially

Ensemble learning is a popular technique to improve the accuracy of machine learning models. It traditionally hinges on the rationale that aggregating multiple weak models can lead to better models with lower variance and hence higher stability, especially for discontinuous base learners. In this paper, we provide a new perspective on ensembling. By selecting the most frequently generated model from the base learner when repeatedly applied to subsamples, we can attain exponentially decaying tails for the excess risk, even if the base learner suffers from slow (i.e., polynomial) decay rates. This tail enhancement power of ensembling applies to base learners that have reasonable predictive power to begin with and is stronger than variance reduction in the sense of exhibiting rate improvement. We demonstrate how our ensemble methods can substantially improve out-of-sample performances in a range of numerical examples involving heavy-tailed data or intrinsically slow rates.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

A Distributionally Robust Optimization Framework for Extreme Event Estimation

Conventional methods for extreme event estimation rely on well-chosen parametric models asymptotically justified from extreme value theory (EVT). These methods, while powerful and theoretically grounded, could however encounter a difficult bias-variance tradeoff that exacerbates especially when data size is too small, deteriorating the reliability of the tail estimation. In this paper, we study a framework based on the recently surging literature of distributionally robust optimization. This approach can be viewed as a nonparametric alternative to conventional EVT, by imposing general shape belief on the tail instead of parametric assumption and using worst-case optimization as a resolution to handle the nonparametric uncertainty. We explain how this approach bypasses the bias-variance tradeoff in EVT. On the other hand, we face a conservativeness-variance tradeoff which we describe how to tackle. We also demonstrate computational tools for the involved optimization problems and compare our performance with conventional EVT across a range of numerical examples.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Propagation of Input Tail Uncertainty in Rare-Event Estimation: A Light versus Heavy Tail Dichotomy

We consider the estimation of small probabilities or other risk quantities associated with rare but catastrophic events. In the model-based literature, much of the focus has been devoted to efficient Monte Carlo computation or analytical approximation assuming the model is accurately specified. In this paper, we study a distinct direction on the propagation of model uncertainty and how it impacts the reliability of rare-event estimates. Specifically, we consider the basic setup of the exceedance of i.i.d. sum, and investigate how the lack of tail information of each input summand can affect the output probability. We argue that heavy-tailed problems are much more vulnerable to input uncertainty than light-tailed problems, reasoned through their large deviations behaviors and numerical evidence. We also investigate some approaches to quantify model errors in this problem using a combination of the bootstrap and extreme value theory, showing some positive outcomes but also uncovering some statistical challenges.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A Cheap Bootstrap Method for Fast Inference

The bootstrap is a versatile inference method that has proven powerful in many statistical problems. However, when applied to modern large-scale models, it could face substantial computation demand from repeated data resampling and model fitting. We present a bootstrap methodology that uses minimal computation, namely with a resample effort as low as one Monte Carlo replication, while maintaining desirable statistical guarantees. We present the theory of this method that uses a twisted perspective from the standard bootstrap principle. We also present generalizations of this method to nested sampling problems and to a range of subsampling variants, and illustrate how it can be used for fast inference across different estimation problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Evaluating Aleatoric Uncertainty via Conditional Generative Models

Aleatoric uncertainty quantification seeks for distributional knowledge of random responses, which is important for reliability analysis and robustness improvement in machine learning applications. Previous research on aleatoric uncertainty estimation mainly targets closed-formed conditional densities or variances, which requires strong restrictions on the data distribution or dimensionality. To overcome these restrictions, we study conditional generative models for aleatoric uncertainty estimation. We introduce two metrics to measure the discrepancy between two conditional distributions that suit these models. Both metrics can be easily and unbiasedly computed via Monte Carlo simulation of the conditional generative models, thus facilitating their evaluation and training. We demonstrate numerically how our metrics provide correct measurements of conditional distributional discrepancies and can be used to train conditional models competitive against existing benchmarks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

General Feasibility Bounds for Sample Average Approximation via Vapnik-Chervonenkis Dimension

We investigate the feasibility of sample average approximation (SAA) for general stochastic optimization problems, including two-stage stochastic programming without the relatively complete recourse assumption. Instead of analyzing problems with specific structures, we utilize results from the Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension and Probably Approximately Correct learning to provide a general framework that offers explicit feasibility bounds for SAA solutions under minimal structural or distributional assumption. We show that, as long as the hypothesis class formed by the feasbible region has a finite VC dimension, the infeasibility of SAA solutions decreases exponentially with computable rates and explicitly identifiable accompanying constants. We demonstrate how our bounds apply more generally and competitively compared to existing results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Prediction Intervals for Simulation Metamodeling

Simulation metamodeling refers to the construction of lower-fidelity models to represent input-output relations using few simulation runs. Stochastic kriging, which is based on Gaussian process, is a versatile and common technique for such a task. However, this approach relies on specific model assumptions and could encounter scalability challenges. In this paper, we study an alternative metamodeling approach using prediction intervals to capture the uncertainty of simulation outputs. We cast the metamodeling task as an empirical constrained optimization framework to train prediction intervals that attain accurate prediction coverage and narrow width. We specifically use neural network to represent these intervals and discuss procedures to approximately solve this optimization problem. We also present an adaptation of conformal prediction tools as another approach to construct prediction intervals for metamodeling. Lastly, we present a validation machinery and show how our method can enjoy a distribution-free finite-sample guarantee on the prediction performance. We demonstrate and compare our proposed approaches with existing methods including stochastic kriging through numerical examples.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Test Against High-Dimensional Uncertainties: Accelerated Evaluation of Autonomous Vehicles with Deep Importance Sampling

Evaluating the performance of autonomous vehicles (AV) and their complex subsystems to high precision under naturalistic circumstances remains a challenge, especially when failure or dangerous cases are rare. Rarity does not only require an enormous sample size for a naive method to achieve high confidence estimation, but it also causes dangerous underestimation of the true failure rate and it is extremely hard to detect. Meanwhile, the state-of-the-art approach that comes with a correctness guarantee can only compute an upper bound for the failure rate under certain conditions, which could limit its practical uses. In this work, we present Deep Importance Sampling (Deep IS) framework that utilizes a deep neural network to obtain an efficient IS that is on par with the state-of-the-art, capable of reducing the required sample size 43 times smaller than the naive sampling method to achieve 10% relative error and while producing an estimate that is much less conservative. Our high-dimensional experiment estimating the misclassification rate of one of the state-of-the-art traffic sign classifiers further reveals that this efficiency still holds true even when the target is very small, achieving over 600 times efficiency boost. This highlights the potential of Deep IS in providing a precise estimate even against high-dimensional uncertainties.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Adaptive Importance Sampling for Efficient Stochastic Root Finding and Quantile Estimation

In solving simulation-based stochastic root-finding or optimization problems that involve rare events, such as in extreme quantile estimation, running crude Monte Carlo can be prohibitively inefficient. To address this issue, importance sampling can be employed to drive down the sampling error to a desirable level. However, selecting a good importance sampler requires knowledge of the solution to the problem at hand, which is the goal to begin with and thus forms a circular challenge. We investigate the use of adaptive importance sampling to untie this circularity. Our procedure sequentially updates the importance sampler to reach the optimal sampler and the optimal solution simultaneously, and can be embedded in both sample average approximation and stochastic approximation-type algorithms. Our theoretical analysis establishes strong consistency and asymptotic normality of the resulting estimators. We also demonstrate, via a minimax perspective, the key role of using adaptivity in controlling asymptotic errors. Finally, we illustrate the effectiveness of our approach via numerical experiments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Deep Probabilistic Accelerated Evaluation: A Robust Certifiable Rare-Event Simulation Methodology for Black-Box Safety-Critical Systems

Evaluating the reliability of intelligent physical systems against rare safety-critical events poses a huge testing burden for real-world applications. Simulation provides a useful platform to evaluate the extremal risks of these systems before their deployments. Importance Sampling (IS), while proven to be powerful for rare-event simulation, faces challenges in handling these learning-based systems due to their black-box nature that fundamentally undermines its efficiency guarantee, which can lead to under-estimation without diagnostically detected. We propose a framework called Deep Probabilistic Accelerated Evaluation (Deep-PrAE) to design statistically guaranteed IS, by converting black-box samplers that are versatile but could lack guarantees, into one with what we call a relaxed efficiency certificate that allows accurate estimation of bounds on the safety-critical event probability. We present the theory of Deep-PrAE that combines the dominating point concept with rare-event set learning via deep neural network classifiers, and demonstrate its effectiveness in numerical examples including the safety-testing of an intelligent driving algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Learning Prediction Intervals for Regression: Generalization and Calibration

We study the generation of prediction intervals in regression for uncertainty quantification. This task can be formalized as an empirical constrained optimization problem that minimizes the average interval width while maintaining the coverage accuracy across data. We strengthen the existing literature by studying two aspects of this empirical optimization. First is a general learning theory to characterize the optimality-feasibility tradeoff that encompasses Lipschitz continuity and VC-subgraph classes, which are exemplified in regression trees and neural networks. Second is a calibration machinery and the corresponding statistical theory to optimally select the regularization parameter that manages this tradeoff, which bypasses the overfitting issues in previous approaches in coverage attainment. We empirically demonstrate the strengths of our interval generation and calibration algorithms in terms of testing performances compared to existing benchmarks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Distributionally Robust Optimization Approach to the NASA Langley Uncertainty Quantification Challenge

We study a methodology to tackle the NASA Langley Uncertainty Quantification Challenge problem, based on an integration of robust optimization, more specifically a recent line of research known as distributionally robust optimization, and importance sampling in Monte Carlo simulation. The main computation machinery in this integrated methodology boils down to solving sampled linear programs. We will illustrate both our numerical performances and theoretical statistical guarantees obtained via connections to nonparametric hypothesis testing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Learning-based Robust Optimization: Procedures and Statistical Guarantees

Robust optimization (RO) is a common approach to tractably obtain safeguarding solutions for optimization problems with uncertain constraints. In this paper, we study a statistical framework to integrate data into RO, based on learning a prediction set using (combinations of) geometric shapes that are compatible with established RO tools, and a simple data-splitting validation step that achieves finite-sample nonparametric statistical guarantees on feasibility. We demonstrate how our required sample size to achieve feasibility at a given confidence level is independent of the dimensions of both the decision space and the probability space governing the stochasticity, and discuss some approaches to improve the objective performances while maintaining these dimension-free statistical feasibility guarantees.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Parametric Scenario Optimization under Limited Data: A Distributionally Robust Optimization View

We consider optimization problems with uncertain constraints that need to be satisfied probabilistically. When data are available, a common method to obtain feasible solutions for such problems is to impose sampled constraints, following the so-called scenario optimization approach. However, when the data size is small, the sampled constraints may not statistically support a feasibility guarantee on the obtained solution. This paper studies how to leverage parametric information and the power of Monte Carlo simulation to obtain feasible solutions for small-data situations. Our approach makes use of a distributionally robust optimization (DRO) formulation that translates the data size requirement into a Monte Carlo sample size requirement drawn from what we call a generating distribution. We show that, while the optimal choice of this generating distribution is the one eliciting the data or the baseline distribution in a nonparametric divergence-based DRO, it is not necessarily so in the parametric case. Correspondingly, we develop procedures to obtain generating distributions that improve upon these basic choices. We support our findings with several numerical examples.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Robust Importance Weighting for Covariate Shift

In many learning problems, the training and testing data follow different distributions and a particularly common situation is the \textit{covariate shift}. To correct for sampling biases, most approaches, including the popular kernel mean matching (KMM), focus on estimating the importance weights between the two distributions. Reweighting-based methods, however, are exposed to high variance when the distributional discrepancy is large and the weights are poorly estimated. On the other hand, the alternate approach of using nonparametric regression (NR) incurs high bias when the training size is limited. In this paper, we propose and analyze a new estimator that systematically integrates the residuals of NR with KMM reweighting, based on a control-variate perspective. The proposed estimator can be shown to either strictly outperform or match the best-known existing rates for both KMM and NR, and thus is a robust combination of both estimators. The experiments shows the estimator works well in practice.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access