Paper detail

Recovering Best Statistical Guarantees via the Empirical Divergence-based Distributionally Robust Optimization

We investigate the use of distributionally robust optimization (DRO) as a tractable tool to recover the asymptotic statistical guarantees provided by the Central Limit Theorem, for maintaining the feasibility of an expected value constraint under ambiguous probability distributions. We show that using empirically defined Burg-entropy divergence balls to construct the DRO can attain such guarantees. These balls, however, are not reasoned from the standard data-driven DRO framework since by themselves they can have low or even zero probability of covering the true distribution. Rather, their superior statistical performances are endowed by linking the resulting DRO with empirical likelihood and empirical processes. We show that the sizes of these balls can be optimally calibrated using chi-square process excursion. We conduct numerical experiments to support our theoretical findings.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.