BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Harry J. Lipkin

Harry J. Lipkin appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
hep-phhep-excond-mat.othernucl-exphysics.atom-phphysics.ins-detquant-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

28works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

28 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

Directed Spontaneous Emission from $N$-atom Extended Ensemble

Coherence and interference play crucial roles in emission and absorption of photons to and from large systems with many atoms. Confusion has arisen because nuclear X-ray physicists and atomic quantum-optics physicists do not understand one another's individual descriptions of related phenomena. Basic physics same for all wave lengths from optical to nuclear gamma ray photons. But different languages are used to describe this physics in different domains. Crucial parameters vary over many orders of magnitude and what is intuitive or counterintuitive varies widely. Differences in parameters arising from differences between coherent emission effects in different domains produce very different results. Unified general treatment of the entire photon spectrum makes basic physics intelligible to all. In the optical region the mean distance between the scattering atoms is much longer than the photon wave length, Dicke superradiant scattering is isotropic and multiple scattering, Fano couplings are important and the lifetimes of intermediate stats are sufficiently short to be negligible. In X-ray scattering the mean distance between atoms is comparable to the photon wave length, Dicke superradiance is concentrated in a forward peak, multiple scattering and Fano effects are negligible, lifetimes are measurably long, speedup shortening the lifetime is important and most of the radiation is not elastically scattered but lost to absorption. Explicit calculations for a one-dimensional array shows the great difference between the case where the photon wave length is much shorter or comparable to the distance between nearest neighbors. A full investigation of the angular distribution and speedup of the intensity for two and three-dimensional scatterers give very different results for the two cases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Entangled symmetries explain without QCD dynamics CP violation in neutral B to Kpi decays; not in charged B decays Unexpected isospin relations in charged and neutral decays,

Simple flavor symmetry argument without QCD dynamics shows why CP violation observed in neutral $B$ to $Kπ$ decays is absent in charged B decays where tree diagram final state has two $u$ quarks satisfying Pauli principle. Entanglement preserves short range symmetry correlations after separation into two mesons. Pauli principle and symmetries require totally flavor-symmetric tree diagram final state. $ππ$ isospin state with I=2 already is flavor symmetric and suffers no symmetry constraint. Strange flavor-symmetric state with V spin V=2 is linear combination of $Kπ$ and $K η$ with probability only (1/4) for $Kπ$. Tree diagram suppression by factor 4 not present in neutral decays explains negligible tree-penguin interference and CP violation in charged decays. Detailed full symmetry analysis shows constraints from space-inversion, charge conjugation, Pauli antisymmetrization and flavor symmetry. Two antiquarks produced at same space point by tree diagram have even parity. Even parity final state requires even parity, even space symmetry and color-spin antisymmetry for two $u$ quarks. Color-singlet spin-singlet final state requires color-spin antisymmetry and therefore flavor symmetry for two-antiquark wave function. Flavor symmetric $\bar u \bar d$ and $\bar u \bar s$ antiquark pairs have isospin I=1 and V-spin V =1. Generalized charge conjugation invariance requires I=2 for $ππ$ tree diagram and V = 2 for $Kπ$. Penguin decays give I = 1/2 final state and no CP violation. Experiments confirm surprising predictions from tree suppression factor not noted in previous analyzes. I=1/2 violations seen only in relation between charged and neutral decays together with no I=3/2 components in each individual decay. Common treatments using $ππ$ data fail to fit $Kπ$ data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Pauli blocking and entanglement solve $Kπ$ puzzle. CP violation in $B^o \rightarrow Kπ$; not in $B^{\pm} \rightarrow Kπ$decays

New data analysis with Pauli blocking and entanglement explains CP violation in $B^o\rightarrow Kπ$ decays, absence in $B^{\pm} \rightarrow Kπ$ decays and predicts unexpected contrast between pure I=1/2 in individual $B^{\pm}$ and $B^o$ final states and I=1/2 violation in relations between them. Analysis of $B\rightarrow Kπ$ data predicts these observed isospin relations and explains dependence on spectator quark flavor. $B^+ \rightarrow Kπ$ tree diagram $\bar b u\rightarrow \bar s u \bar u u$ has two identical $u$ quarks from weak vertex and spectator. The Pauli principle requires these quarks at short distances to have wave functions antisymmetric in color or spin. The eigenvalues of conserved symmetries remain entangled in a final state of two separated mesons. This Pauli entanglement suppresses tree-penguin interference and CP violation in $B^+$ decay but not in $B^o$ decay with spectator $d$ quark. The four-body wave function must have two antiquarks with the same symmetry combining with two u-quarks to fragment into a two-pseudoscalar-meson state even under charge conjugation with angular momentum zero. It is classified in the 27-dimensional representation of flavor SU(3) with isospin I=2 for the $ππ$ state and V spin V=2 for the corresponding strange state which is linear combination of $Kπ$ and $Kη_8$. These symmetries remain entangled in four-body wave function even after separation into two mesons. Strong Pauli suppression in tree transitions to $Kπ$ which has only a small V=2 component and is mainly V=1. No Pauli suppression in transitions to I=2 $ππ$ state with also two $u$ quarks but different color-spin couplings. Standard definition of independent color favored and suppressed tree diagrams in $B^\pm\rightarrow Kπ$ decays neglects $uu$ Pauli entanglement.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Simple quantum mechanics explains GSI Darmstadt oscillations Even with undetected neutrino; Momentum conservation requires Same interference producing oscillations in initial and final states

GSI experiment studying oscillations in K-capture decay of radioactive ion investigates neutrino masses and mixing without detecting neutrino. Even when neutrino is not detected quantum mechanics relates initial and final states. The basic physics is very simple. Neutrinos emitted in beta decay are coherent linear combinations of states with different masses, different momenta and same energy. Since the weak interaction producing the neutrino conserves momentum, the initial state before the transition must also contain a coherent linear combination of states with the same momentum difference and a well defined relative magnitude and phase. A one-particle state with a definite momentum difference also has an easily calculated energy difference. In the time interval between creation of the ion and its decay a linear combination of two states with different energies oscillates in time. Measuring the oscillation period gives a value for the difference between squared neutrino masses of the two neutrino mass eigenstates. The value obtained from a crude approximation with no free parameters for this "two-slit" or "which path" experiment in momentum space differs by less than 10% from the result observed in the KAMLAND experiment. Observing only ion disappearance without detecting neutrino avoids signal suppression by low neutrino absorption cross section

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Why do neutrinos with different masses interfere and oscillate? Why are states with different masses but same energy coherent? Overcoming barrier between particle & condensed matter physics

Neutrino oscillations occur only if it is impossible to determine $ν$ mass by using conservation laws on measurements of nucleon-lepton system absorbing $ν$. No oscillations if $ν$ detector is mass spectrometer. Beam is split into components with different masses entering different counters. For each event only one counter will click and determine $ν$ mass. Condensed matter physics needed to describe the $ν$ detector, show it is not a mass spectrometer and identify which properties of the incident $ν$ are unobservable. Relativistic quantum field theory can only describe $ν$ wave function entering detector but not large uncertain momentum transfers to detector nor associated energy-momentum asymmetry. Absorption of incident $ν$'s with different momenta but same energy leaves no trace of initial $ν$ momentum difference in finite-size $ν$ detector with effectively infinite mass at rest in laboratory. Undetectable recoil-free momentum is transferred to the detector with negligible energy transfer. The Debye-Waller factor common in X-ray diffraction by crystals gives probability that absorbing $ν$'s with different momenta produce same nucleon-charged-lepton final state. Oscillations in time described in textbooks as interference between $ν$ states with different energies not observable in realistic experiments. Different energy $ν$'s not coherent because energy can be determined by measurements on initial and final states. Experiments detecting $ν$ produced by $πto μν$ decay observe no electrons even though $ν$ mass eigenstates produce electrons. Electron amplitude canceled by interference between amplitudes from different $ν$ mass eigenstates with same energy and different momenta entering massive detector.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Heavy Baryons and Exotics Spectrum

We discuss several highly accurate theoretical predictions for masses of baryons containing the b quark which have been recently confirmed by experimental data. Several predictions are given for additional properties of heavy baryons. We also discuss the two charged exotic resonances Z_b with quantum numbers of a (b bbar u ddbar) tetraquark, very recently reported by Belle in the channel [Upsilon(nS) π^+, n=1,2,3]. Among possible implications are deeply bound I=0 counterparts of the Z_b-s and existence of a Sigma_b^+ Sigma_b^- dibaryon, a "beauteron".

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

New $B^{\pm}\to Kπ$ data explain absence of CP violation Tree-penguin interference canceled by Pauli effects

Observation of CP violation in $B^o\to K^\pmπ^{\mp}$ decays and its absence in $B^+\to K^+π^o$ decays are explained in new improved data analysis of more precise $B\to Kπ$ data. Success of the "Lipkin Sum Rule" indicates that four $B\tow Kπ$ branching ratios are determined by three parameters, the penguin diagram $P$ and two interference terms $P\cdot T$ and $P\cdot S$ between the dominant penguin and two tree diagrams; the color-favored and color suppressed diagrams. Previous analyzes confirmed the model with errors leaving values of interference terms less that two standard deviations from zero. The observation CP violation in $B^o\to K^\pmπ^{\mp}$ decays indicates a finite value for $P\cdot T$. New precise data analysis show $P\cdot T$ and $P\cdot S$ interference contributions well above errors. Their contributions to $B^\pm\to Kπ$ decays are shown to be nearly equal with opposite phase and cancel within experimental errors. This cancelation unexpected in previous analyzes explains the failure to see CP violation in $B^\pm\to Kπ$ decays. It can be due to the Pauli antisymmetry exchange neglected in previous analyzes. Two $B^\pm\to Kπ$ tree diagrams differ by interchange of two identical $u$ quarks. $B^o\to K^\pmπ^{\mp}$ diagrams have no identical quark pairs. This Pauli effect explains the difference produced by changing the flavor of the spectator quark which does not participate in the weak interaction. Our analysis differs from previous analyzes which assume SU(3) flavor symmetry to use input from $B\to ππ$ data and neglect Pauli effects. We use new data, include Pauli effects and strong final state interactions to all orders in QCD with no higher flavor symmetry assumed beyond isospin. We do not use $B\to ππ$ data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

New Analysis of $B \rightarrow Kπ$ data with Pauli blocking CP violation in $B^o$ decays, not in $B^{\pm}$ SU(3) use of $B \rightarrow ππ$ data invalid for $B \rightarrow Kπ$

New data analysis with Pauli blocking explains observation of CP violation in $B^o\rightarrow Kπ$ decays, absence in $B^{\pm} \rightarrow Kπ$ decays and gives new predictions agreeing with experiment. Branching ratio data show pure I=1/2 amplitude predicted by pure penguin transitions for separate relations within charged and neutral B decays, but strong violation of penguin I=1/2 isospin relation between charged and neutral decays. $B(B^o \rightarrow K^+ π^-) - 2B(B^o\rightarrow K^o π^o) = %(19.4 \pm 0.6)- 2\cdot (9.4 \pm 0.6) = (0.6 \pm 1.3)\cdot 10^-6 \approx 0$ $2B(B^+ \rightarrow K^+ π^o) - B(B^+ \rightarrow K^o π^+) = %(25.8\pm 1.2) - (23.1 \pm 1.0) = (2.7 \pm 1.6)\cdot 10^-6 \approx 0$ ${{τ^o}\over{τ^+}}\cdot 2B(B^+ \rightarrow K^+ π^o) - B(B^o \rightarrow K^+ π^-) = (4.7 \pm 0.82)\cdot 10^-6 \not= 0$ This contrast between pure I=1/2 observed in individual charged and neutral final states and I=1/2 violation in relations between them is unexpected in previous treatments. Pauli blocking predicts this contrast by noting that two identical $u$ quarks in a relative s-wave are Pauli blocked. Tree diagram $\bar b\rightarrow \bar s u \bar u$ for $\bar b$ producing $u$ quark at weak vertex and tree-penguin interference producing CP violation are Pauli suppressed for $B^+$ decays with identical $u$ quark spectator. No suppression in $B^o$ decays with spectator $d$ quark. $B\rightarrow Kπ$ data analysis discards all amplitudes containing two identical $u$ quarks in final state and predicts observed isospin relations by using only Pauli-favored amplitudes ${B_u}\rightarrow \bar s du \bar d$ and ${B_d}\rightarrow \bar s ud \bar u$. Pauli-favored transitions explain dependence on flavor of spectator quark which does not participate in the weak interaction.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

About a Possible Nonstrange Cousin of the Theta+ Pentaquark

We discuss the implications of the suggested interpretation of the recently reported narrow pi N resonance (width \approx 25 MeV at 1680 MeV) as a pentaquark in the same multiplet as the Theta+. We consider a diquark-triquark pentaquark model involving a recoupling of the five quarks into a diquark-triquark system in non-standard color representations. We estimate the mass using a well-tested simple mass formula. Our rough numerical estimate puts the pi N pentaquark resonance at 1720 MeV, sufficiently close to the reported value of 1680 MeV to indicate that this approach deserves further more accurate investigation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Isospin Violation in X(3872): Explanation From a New Tetraquark Model

New data for X(3872) production in B decays provide a separation between X production and decay, sharpen several experimental puzzles and impose serious constraints on all models. Both charged and neutral B decays produce a narrow neutral resonant state that decays to both J/ψρand J/ψω, while no charged resonances in the same multiplet are found. This suggests that the X is an isoscalar resonance whose production conserves isospin, while isospin is violated only in the decay by an electromagnetic interaction allowing the isospin-forbidden J/ψρdecay. A tetraquark isoscalar X model is proposed which agrees with all present data, conserves isospin in its production and breaks isospin only in an electromagnetic X(3872) --> J/ψρ^o decay. The narrow X decay width results from the tiny phase space available for the J/ψωdecay and enables competition with the electromagnetic isospin-forbidden J/ψρdecay which has much larger phase space. Experimental tests are proposed for this isospin production invariance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

The Quark Model and $b$ Baryons

The recent observation at the Tevatron of $Σ_b^{\pm}$ ($uub$ and $ddb$) baryons within 2 MeV of the predicted $Σ_b - Λ_b$ splitting and of $Ξ_b^-$ $(dsb)$ baryons at the Tevatron within a few MeV of predictions has provided strong confirmation for a theoretical approach based on modeling the color hyperfine interaction. The prediction of $M(Ξ^-_b) = 5790$ to 5800 MeV is reviewed and similar methods used to predict the masses of the excited states $Ξ_b^\prime$ and $Ξ_b^*$. The main source of uncertainty is the method used to estimate the mass difference $m_b - m_c$ from known hadrons. We verify that corrections due to the details of the interquark potential and to $Ξ_b$--$Ξ_b^\prime$ mixing are small. For S-wave $qqb$ states we predict $M(Ω_b) = 6052.1 \pm 5.6$ MeV, $M(Ω^*_b) = 6082.8 \pm 5.6$ MeV, and $M(Ξ_b^0) = 5786.7 \pm 3.0$ MeV. For states with one unit of orbital angular momentum between the $b$ quark and the two light quarks we predict $M(Λ_{b[1/2]}) = 5929 \pm 2$ MeV, $M(Λ_{b[3/2]}) = 5940 \pm 2$ MeV, $M(Ξ_{b[1/2]}) = 6106 \pm 4$ MeV, and $M(Ξ_{b[3/2]}) = 6115 \pm 4$ MeV. Results are compared with those of other recent approaches.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2006arXiv

Quantum Theory of Neutrino Oscillations for Pedestrians - Simple Answers to Confusing Questions

Why are different mass states coherent? What is the correct formula for the oscillation phase? How can textbook formulas for oscillations in time describe experiments which never measure time? How can we treat the different velocities and different transit times of different mass eigenstates and avoid incorrect factors of two? How can textbook forumulas which describe coherence between energy states be justified when Stodolsky's theorem states there is no coherence between different energies? Is covariant relativistic quantum field theory necessary to describe neutrino oscillations? How important is the detector, which is at rest in the laboratory and cannot be Lorentz tranformed to other frames? These questions are answered by a simple rigorous calculation which includes the quantum fluctuations in the position of the detector and in the transit time between source and detector. The commonly used standard formula for neutrino oscillation phases is confirmed. An "ideal" detector which measures precisely the energy and momentum of the neutrino destroys all phases in the initial wave packet and cannot observe oscillations. A realistic detector preserves the phase differences between neutrinos having the same energy and different momenta and confirms the standard formula. Whether phase differences between neutrinos with different energies are observable or destroyed by the detector is irrelevant.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2005arXiv

Analysis of new charmless strange B decay data leaves high $B\to Kη'$ and $B\to Kη' X$ still unexplained

The question of whether the anomalously large $B \to Kη' $ and $B \to Kη' X $ (inclusive) branching ratios are consistent with the standard model or a sign of new physics is still open and in the experimental court. The nature of the extra hadron $X$ in $B \to Kη' X $ is completely unknown. Directions for investigation and analysis of inclusive data are suggested as well as for comparable inclusive data on $B \to KηX $. New data confirming the prediction $BR(K^\pm ρ^o) = BR(K^\pm ω)$ support flavor-topology $B \to VP$ sum rules based on the OZI rule and emphasize the sharp contrast with the failure of the analogous $B \to PP $ sum rule due to the anomalously large $BR(B \to Kη')$. Confirmation of OZI validity in B-decay analyses for VP final states suggests improving data on the analogous neutral decay difference $BR(B^o \to K^o ρ^o) - BR(B^o \to K^o ω)$ which measures tree-penguin interference and possible direct CP violation. A successful approximate isospin sum rule is rearranged and reinterpreted to pinpoint tree-penguin interference in $B \to K π$ and $B \to K ρ$ transitions. The magnitude of the interference is shown to still be at the statistical noise level with present data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2005arXiv

Is observed direct CP violation in $B_d \to K^+ π^-$ due to new physics? Check standard model prediction of equal violation in $B_s \to K^- π^+$

The recently observed direct CP violation in $B_d \to K^+ π^-$ has raised suggestions of possible new physics. A robust test of the standard model vs. new physics is its prediction of equal direct CP violation in $B_s \to K^- π^+$ decay. CPT invariance requires the observed CP violation to arise from the interference between the dominant penguin amplitude and another amplitude with a different weak phase and a different strong phase. The penguin contribution to $B_d \to K^+ π^-$ is known to be reduced by a CKM factor in $B_s \to K^- π^+$. Thus the two branching ratios are very different and a different CP violation is expected. But in the standard model a miracle occurs and the interfering tree diagram is enhanced by the same CKM factor that reduces the penguin to give the predicted equality. This miracle is not expected in new physics; thus a search for and measurement of the predicted CP violation in $B_s \to K^- π^+$ decay is a sensitive test for a new physics contribution. A detailed analysis shows this prediction to be robust and insensitive to symmetry breaking effects and possible additional contributions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2005arXiv

New tests for experiments producing pentaquarks

The distribution of the squared momentum difference |P_A|^2 - |P_B|^2 between the momenta in the laboratory system of two experimentally observed particles A and B provides a test for whether an observed mass peak indicates a real resonance rather than nonresonant background or kinematic reflection. The angular distribution of the relative momenta in the center-of-mass system exhibits a forward-backward symmetry in the production and decay of any resonance with a definite parity. This symmetry is not expected in other nonresonant processes and can be expressed without needing angular distributions in terms of the easily measured momenta in the laboratory frame that are already measured and used to calculate the invariant mass of the system. Our test is especially useful for low statistics experiments where the full angular distribution cannot be determined. It can be applied to both fixed-target and collider searches for the Theta^+ and Theta_c pentaquarks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2005arXiv

On a possible tetraquark cousin of the Theta^+

If a narrow Theta^+ pentaquark exists, it is likely that a ud\bar s-ud triquark-diquark configuration is a significant component of its wave function. If so, the mechanism responsible for the binding of a triquark and a diquark is also likely to bind the triquark to an \bar s antiquark. We discuss the expected properties of such a ud\bar s-\bar s tetraquark meson. In particular, we point out that for a 0^+ isoscalar ud\bar s\bar s meson the lowest allowed decay mode is a four-body K K pi pi channel with a small phase space and a distinctive experimental signature.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2003arXiv

Nonleptonic $Λ_b$ decays to $D_s(2317)$, $D_s(2460)$ and other final states in Factorization

We consider nonleptonic Cabibbo--allowed $Λ_b$ decays in the factorization approximation. We calculate nonleptonic decays of the type $ Λ_b \to Λ_c P $ and $ Λ_b \to Λ_c V $ relative to $\bar{B}_d \to D^+ P$ and $\bar{B}_d \to D^+ V$ where we include among the pseudoscalar states(P) and the vector states(V) the newly discovered $D_s$ resonances, $D_s(2317)$ and $D_s(2460)$. In the ratio of $Λ_b$ decays to $D_s(2317)$ and $D_s(2460)$ relative to the $\bar{B}_d$ decays to these states, the poorly known decay constants of $D_s(2317)$ and $D_s(2460)$ cancel leading to predictions that can shed light on the nature of these new states. In general, we predict the $Λ_b$ decays to be larger than the corresponding $\bar{B}_d$ decays and in particular we find the branching ratio for $Λ_b \to Λ_c D_s(2460)$ can be between four to five times the branching ratio for $\bar{B}_d \to D^+ D_s(2460)$. This enhancement of $Λ_b$ branching ratios follows primarily from the fact that more partial waves contribute in $Λ_b$ decays than in $\bar{B}_d$ decays. Our predictions are largely independent of model calculations of hadronic inputs like form factors and decay constants.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2003arXiv

What is coherent in neutrino oscillations

Simple rigorous quantum mechanics with no hand waving nor loopholes clarifies the confusion between three contradictory descriptions of neutrino oscillations: (1)The time oscillations shown in standard textbooks produced by neutrino eigenstates with different masses and different energies. (2) That time oscillations and interference between states having different energies cannot be observed in realistic experiments. (3) That interference between different neutrino mass eigenstates is not observable in "missing mass" experiments where information determining the neutrino mass is available from other particles measured in production or detection vertices. Quantum-mechanical ignorance of the neutrino momentum is rigorously shown to be imposed by all realistic detectors and to produce coherence between amplitudes from neutrino states with the same energy and different masses. Conditions are precisely formulated for the loss of coherence when mass eigenstate wave packets moving with different velocities separate. The example of Bragg scattering shows how quantum-mechanically imposed ignorance produces coherence.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2002arXiv

Non Standard $η-η^{\prime}$ mixing and the Nonleptonic B and $Λ_b$ Decays to $η$ and $η^{\prime}$

Radial mixing in the pseudoscalar $η-η^{\prime}$ systems can be generated from hyperfine interactions and annihilation terms. For the $η-η^{\prime}$ system we find the effects of radial mixing are appreciable and seriously affect the decay branching ratios for $B \to η(η^{\prime})K(K^*)$, mainly by modifying the $B \to η(η^{\prime})$ form factors. In particular, the effect of radial mixing in conjunction with the interference effects among penguin amplitudes can resolve puzzles in the $B \to η(η^{\prime}) K$ decays. The decay $Λ_b \to Λη(η^{\prime})$ on the other hand is dominated by a single amplitude so that the significant interference effects of B decays are absent here. Moreover, since no $Λ_b \to η(η^{\prime})$ form factors are involved here, the effect of radial mixing is essentially negligible. Hence, unlike the B system, we do not predict a large enhancement of $Λ_b \to Λη^{\prime}$ relative to $Λ_b \to Λη$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2001arXiv

Relations for two body B Decays to Charmonium and tests for $η-η^{\prime}$ mixing

The two body decays of $B_d$ and $B_s$ decays into $J/ψM$, where $M$ is a light meson, is studied under the very simple assumptions that the spectator quark does not play a role in the decay of the weak heavy quark or antiquark. This hypothesis leads to interesting relations between decay amplitudes. The assumption of SU(3) symmetry leads to additional relations between the decay amplitudes and in particular, the eight CP eigenstates $J/ψK_S$, $J/ψη$, $J/ψη^{\prime}$ and $J/ψπ^o$ are all given in terms of 0. If agreement with experiment validates these assumptions the parameters over determined by the results will give information about the ratio of penguin to tree contributions to the "golden channel" $B^o \to J/ψK_S$ decay and will provide tests for the standard $η-η^{\prime}$ mixing, which assumes that this mixing is determined by a single mixing angle, as well as determine the value of the mixing angle. We also present tests of the standard $η-η^{\prime}$ mixing involving semileptonic $D$ decays.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2001arXiv

Systematics of Large Axial Vector Meson Production in Heavy Flavor Weak Decays

Branching ratios observed for $D$ and B decays to final states $a_1(1260)^{\pm} X$ are comparable to those for corresponding decays to $π^{\pm} X$ and $ρ^{\pm} X$ and much larger than those for all other decays. Implications are discussed of a "vector-dominance model" in which a $W$ is produced and immediately turns into an axial vector, vector or pseudoscalar meson. Data for decays to all such final states are shown to have large branching ratios and satisfy universality relations. Upper limits on small strong phase differences between amplitudes relevant to CP violation models are obtained from analysis of the predicted and observed suppression of $B^o$ decays into neutral final states $π^o X^o$, $ρ^oX^o$ and $a_1^o X^o$. . Branching ratios of $\approx 1%$ are predicted for the as yet unobserved presence of the $D_{s1}(2536)$ charmed-strange axial vector in B decays.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1999arXiv

Theoretical Summary of the HADRON99 conference

The Constituent Quark Model has provided a remarkable description of the experimentally observed hadron spectrum but still has no firm theoretical basis. Attempts to provide a QCD justification discussed at Hadron99 include QCD Sum Rules, instantons, relativistic potential models and the lattice. Phenomenological analyses to clarify outstanding problems like the nature of the scalar and pseudoscalar mesons and the low branching ratio for $ψ' \to ρ-π$ were presented. New experimental puzzles include the observation of $\bar p p \to ϕπ$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1995arXiv

Theories of Non-Experiments in Coherent Decays of Neutral Mesons

Many theoretical calculations of subtle coherent effects in quantum mechanics do not carefully consider the interface between their calculations and experiment. Calculations for gedanken experiments using initial states not satisfied in realistic experiments give results requiring interpretation. Confusion and ambiguities frequently arise. Calculations for time-dependent mixing oscillations describe non-experiments. Physical experiments describe oscillations in space in the laboratory system resulting from interference between waves having the same energy and time dependence; $not$ different momenta and space dependence. Time-dependent oscillations are not observed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1993arXiv

Implications of $τ$ Decays into Strange Scalar and Axial Vector Mesons

Recent reports of the observation of the decay $τ\rarrow ν_τ + K + π+ π$ raise interesting questions. The $u-s$ quark mass difference can induce an effective second-class current in the strange sector and enhance decays to helicity-suppressed scalar states. This suggests searches for scalar strange mesons in the $τ\rarrow ν_τ + K + η' $ and $τ\rarrow ν_τ + K + π$ decay modes. $τ$ decays to axial vector final states may clarify strange meson spectroscopy by analogy with the clarification of the $a_1$ problem in the nonstrange sector. Open questions include mixing effects in the strange axial vector mesons and the implications of models based on QCD for hadronization and final state interactions following the creation of a $q \bar q$ pair by a weak vertex,

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1992arXiv

Bose-Einstein Correlations for Mixed Neutral Mesons

Correlations are shown to arise in nonidentical mixed-particle pairs like $K^o \bar K^o$ when observed in identical decay modes like $K_S K_S$ in multiparticle final states containing many partial waves. No enhancement is found in any single partial wave and all partial wave analyses of the s-wave threshold resonance $a_o$ and $f_o$ should give the same results for all decay modes. In CP violation experiments where $B^o - \bar B^o$ pairs are inclusively produced and correlated decays into $ψK_S$ and leptonic modes are observed, the CP-violating lepton asymmetry is enhanced by a factor of two in the kinematic region where Bose enhancement occurs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access