BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Harry J. Lipkin

Harry J. Lipkin contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
hep-phhep-excond-mat.othernucl-exphysics.atom-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
17works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

17 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

Directed Spontaneous Emission from $N$-atom Extended Ensemble

Coherence and interference play crucial roles in emission and absorption of photons to and from large systems with many atoms. Confusion has arisen because nuclear X-ray physicists and atomic quantum-optics physicists do not understand one another's individual descriptions of related phenomena. Basic physics same for all wave lengths from optical to nuclear gamma ray photons. But different languages are used to describe this physics in different domains. Crucial parameters vary over many orders of magnitude and what is intuitive or counterintuitive varies widely. Differences in parameters arising from differences between coherent emission effects in different domains produce very different results. Unified general treatment of the entire photon spectrum makes basic physics intelligible to all. In the optical region the mean distance between the scattering atoms is much longer than the photon wave length, Dicke superradiant scattering is isotropic and multiple scattering, Fano couplings are important and the lifetimes of intermediate stats are sufficiently short to be negligible. In X-ray scattering the mean distance between atoms is comparable to the photon wave length, Dicke superradiance is concentrated in a forward peak, multiple scattering and Fano effects are negligible, lifetimes are measurably long, speedup shortening the lifetime is important and most of the radiation is not elastically scattered but lost to absorption. Explicit calculations for a one-dimensional array shows the great difference between the case where the photon wave length is much shorter or comparable to the distance between nearest neighbors. A full investigation of the angular distribution and speedup of the intensity for two and three-dimensional scatterers give very different results for the two cases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Pauli blocking and entanglement solve $Kπ$ puzzle. CP violation in $B^o \rightarrow Kπ$; not in $B^{\pm} \rightarrow Kπ$decays

New data analysis with Pauli blocking and entanglement explains CP violation in $B^o\rightarrow Kπ$ decays, absence in $B^{\pm} \rightarrow Kπ$ decays and predicts unexpected contrast between pure I=1/2 in individual $B^{\pm}$ and $B^o$ final states and I=1/2 violation in relations between them. Analysis of $B\rightarrow Kπ$ data predicts these observed isospin relations and explains dependence on spectator quark flavor. $B^+ \rightarrow Kπ$ tree diagram $\bar b u\rightarrow \bar s u \bar u u$ has two identical $u$ quarks from weak vertex and spectator. The Pauli principle requires these quarks at short distances to have wave functions antisymmetric in color or spin. The eigenvalues of conserved symmetries remain entangled in a final state of two separated mesons. This Pauli entanglement suppresses tree-penguin interference and CP violation in $B^+$ decay but not in $B^o$ decay with spectator $d$ quark. The four-body wave function must have two antiquarks with the same symmetry combining with two u-quarks to fragment into a two-pseudoscalar-meson state even under charge conjugation with angular momentum zero. It is classified in the 27-dimensional representation of flavor SU(3) with isospin I=2 for the $ππ$ state and V spin V=2 for the corresponding strange state which is linear combination of $Kπ$ and $Kη_8$. These symmetries remain entangled in four-body wave function even after separation into two mesons. Strong Pauli suppression in tree transitions to $Kπ$ which has only a small V=2 component and is mainly V=1. No Pauli suppression in transitions to I=2 $ππ$ state with also two $u$ quarks but different color-spin couplings. Standard definition of independent color favored and suppressed tree diagrams in $B^\pm\rightarrow Kπ$ decays neglects $uu$ Pauli entanglement.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Simple quantum mechanics explains GSI Darmstadt oscillations Even with undetected neutrino; Momentum conservation requires Same interference producing oscillations in initial and final states

GSI experiment studying oscillations in K-capture decay of radioactive ion investigates neutrino masses and mixing without detecting neutrino. Even when neutrino is not detected quantum mechanics relates initial and final states. The basic physics is very simple. Neutrinos emitted in beta decay are coherent linear combinations of states with different masses, different momenta and same energy. Since the weak interaction producing the neutrino conserves momentum, the initial state before the transition must also contain a coherent linear combination of states with the same momentum difference and a well defined relative magnitude and phase. A one-particle state with a definite momentum difference also has an easily calculated energy difference. In the time interval between creation of the ion and its decay a linear combination of two states with different energies oscillates in time. Measuring the oscillation period gives a value for the difference between squared neutrino masses of the two neutrino mass eigenstates. The value obtained from a crude approximation with no free parameters for this "two-slit" or "which path" experiment in momentum space differs by less than 10% from the result observed in the KAMLAND experiment. Observing only ion disappearance without detecting neutrino avoids signal suppression by low neutrino absorption cross section

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Heavy Baryons and Exotics Spectrum

We discuss several highly accurate theoretical predictions for masses of baryons containing the b quark which have been recently confirmed by experimental data. Several predictions are given for additional properties of heavy baryons. We also discuss the two charged exotic resonances Z_b with quantum numbers of a (b bbar u ddbar) tetraquark, very recently reported by Belle in the channel [Upsilon(nS) π^+, n=1,2,3]. Among possible implications are deeply bound I=0 counterparts of the Z_b-s and existence of a Sigma_b^+ Sigma_b^- dibaryon, a "beauteron".

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

New $B^{\pm}\to Kπ$ data explain absence of CP violation Tree-penguin interference canceled by Pauli effects

Observation of CP violation in $B^o\to K^\pmπ^{\mp}$ decays and its absence in $B^+\to K^+π^o$ decays are explained in new improved data analysis of more precise $B\to Kπ$ data. Success of the "Lipkin Sum Rule" indicates that four $B\tow Kπ$ branching ratios are determined by three parameters, the penguin diagram $P$ and two interference terms $P\cdot T$ and $P\cdot S$ between the dominant penguin and two tree diagrams; the color-favored and color suppressed diagrams. Previous analyzes confirmed the model with errors leaving values of interference terms less that two standard deviations from zero. The observation CP violation in $B^o\to K^\pmπ^{\mp}$ decays indicates a finite value for $P\cdot T$. New precise data analysis show $P\cdot T$ and $P\cdot S$ interference contributions well above errors. Their contributions to $B^\pm\to Kπ$ decays are shown to be nearly equal with opposite phase and cancel within experimental errors. This cancelation unexpected in previous analyzes explains the failure to see CP violation in $B^\pm\to Kπ$ decays. It can be due to the Pauli antisymmetry exchange neglected in previous analyzes. Two $B^\pm\to Kπ$ tree diagrams differ by interchange of two identical $u$ quarks. $B^o\to K^\pmπ^{\mp}$ diagrams have no identical quark pairs. This Pauli effect explains the difference produced by changing the flavor of the spectator quark which does not participate in the weak interaction. Our analysis differs from previous analyzes which assume SU(3) flavor symmetry to use input from $B\to ππ$ data and neglect Pauli effects. We use new data, include Pauli effects and strong final state interactions to all orders in QCD with no higher flavor symmetry assumed beyond isospin. We do not use $B\to ππ$ data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

New Analysis of $B \rightarrow Kπ$ data with Pauli blocking CP violation in $B^o$ decays, not in $B^{\pm}$ SU(3) use of $B \rightarrow ππ$ data invalid for $B \rightarrow Kπ$

New data analysis with Pauli blocking explains observation of CP violation in $B^o\rightarrow Kπ$ decays, absence in $B^{\pm} \rightarrow Kπ$ decays and gives new predictions agreeing with experiment. Branching ratio data show pure I=1/2 amplitude predicted by pure penguin transitions for separate relations within charged and neutral B decays, but strong violation of penguin I=1/2 isospin relation between charged and neutral decays. $B(B^o \rightarrow K^+ π^-) - 2B(B^o\rightarrow K^o π^o) = %(19.4 \pm 0.6)- 2\cdot (9.4 \pm 0.6) = (0.6 \pm 1.3)\cdot 10^-6 \approx 0$ $2B(B^+ \rightarrow K^+ π^o) - B(B^+ \rightarrow K^o π^+) = %(25.8\pm 1.2) - (23.1 \pm 1.0) = (2.7 \pm 1.6)\cdot 10^-6 \approx 0$ ${{τ^o}\over{τ^+}}\cdot 2B(B^+ \rightarrow K^+ π^o) - B(B^o \rightarrow K^+ π^-) = (4.7 \pm 0.82)\cdot 10^-6 \not= 0$ This contrast between pure I=1/2 observed in individual charged and neutral final states and I=1/2 violation in relations between them is unexpected in previous treatments. Pauli blocking predicts this contrast by noting that two identical $u$ quarks in a relative s-wave are Pauli blocked. Tree diagram $\bar b\rightarrow \bar s u \bar u$ for $\bar b$ producing $u$ quark at weak vertex and tree-penguin interference producing CP violation are Pauli suppressed for $B^+$ decays with identical $u$ quark spectator. No suppression in $B^o$ decays with spectator $d$ quark. $B\rightarrow Kπ$ data analysis discards all amplitudes containing two identical $u$ quarks in final state and predicts observed isospin relations by using only Pauli-favored amplitudes ${B_u}\rightarrow \bar s du \bar d$ and ${B_d}\rightarrow \bar s ud \bar u$. Pauli-favored transitions explain dependence on flavor of spectator quark which does not participate in the weak interaction.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

About a Possible Nonstrange Cousin of the Theta+ Pentaquark

We discuss the implications of the suggested interpretation of the recently reported narrow pi N resonance (width \approx 25 MeV at 1680 MeV) as a pentaquark in the same multiplet as the Theta+. We consider a diquark-triquark pentaquark model involving a recoupling of the five quarks into a diquark-triquark system in non-standard color representations. We estimate the mass using a well-tested simple mass formula. Our rough numerical estimate puts the pi N pentaquark resonance at 1720 MeV, sufficiently close to the reported value of 1680 MeV to indicate that this approach deserves further more accurate investigation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Isospin Violation in X(3872): Explanation From a New Tetraquark Model

New data for X(3872) production in B decays provide a separation between X production and decay, sharpen several experimental puzzles and impose serious constraints on all models. Both charged and neutral B decays produce a narrow neutral resonant state that decays to both J/ψρand J/ψω, while no charged resonances in the same multiplet are found. This suggests that the X is an isoscalar resonance whose production conserves isospin, while isospin is violated only in the decay by an electromagnetic interaction allowing the isospin-forbidden J/ψρdecay. A tetraquark isoscalar X model is proposed which agrees with all present data, conserves isospin in its production and breaks isospin only in an electromagnetic X(3872) --> J/ψρ^o decay. The narrow X decay width results from the tiny phase space available for the J/ψωdecay and enables competition with the electromagnetic isospin-forbidden J/ψρdecay which has much larger phase space. Experimental tests are proposed for this isospin production invariance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

The Quark Model and $b$ Baryons

The recent observation at the Tevatron of $Σ_b^{\pm}$ ($uub$ and $ddb$) baryons within 2 MeV of the predicted $Σ_b - Λ_b$ splitting and of $Ξ_b^-$ $(dsb)$ baryons at the Tevatron within a few MeV of predictions has provided strong confirmation for a theoretical approach based on modeling the color hyperfine interaction. The prediction of $M(Ξ^-_b) = 5790$ to 5800 MeV is reviewed and similar methods used to predict the masses of the excited states $Ξ_b^\prime$ and $Ξ_b^*$. The main source of uncertainty is the method used to estimate the mass difference $m_b - m_c$ from known hadrons. We verify that corrections due to the details of the interquark potential and to $Ξ_b$--$Ξ_b^\prime$ mixing are small. For S-wave $qqb$ states we predict $M(Ω_b) = 6052.1 \pm 5.6$ MeV, $M(Ω^*_b) = 6082.8 \pm 5.6$ MeV, and $M(Ξ_b^0) = 5786.7 \pm 3.0$ MeV. For states with one unit of orbital angular momentum between the $b$ quark and the two light quarks we predict $M(Λ_{b[1/2]}) = 5929 \pm 2$ MeV, $M(Λ_{b[3/2]}) = 5940 \pm 2$ MeV, $M(Ξ_{b[1/2]}) = 6106 \pm 4$ MeV, and $M(Ξ_{b[3/2]}) = 6115 \pm 4$ MeV. Results are compared with those of other recent approaches.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2005arXiv

Is observed direct CP violation in $B_d \to K^+ π^-$ due to new physics? Check standard model prediction of equal violation in $B_s \to K^- π^+$

The recently observed direct CP violation in $B_d \to K^+ π^-$ has raised suggestions of possible new physics. A robust test of the standard model vs. new physics is its prediction of equal direct CP violation in $B_s \to K^- π^+$ decay. CPT invariance requires the observed CP violation to arise from the interference between the dominant penguin amplitude and another amplitude with a different weak phase and a different strong phase. The penguin contribution to $B_d \to K^+ π^-$ is known to be reduced by a CKM factor in $B_s \to K^- π^+$. Thus the two branching ratios are very different and a different CP violation is expected. But in the standard model a miracle occurs and the interfering tree diagram is enhanced by the same CKM factor that reduces the penguin to give the predicted equality. This miracle is not expected in new physics; thus a search for and measurement of the predicted CP violation in $B_s \to K^- π^+$ decay is a sensitive test for a new physics contribution. A detailed analysis shows this prediction to be robust and insensitive to symmetry breaking effects and possible additional contributions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2005arXiv

New tests for experiments producing pentaquarks

The distribution of the squared momentum difference |P_A|^2 - |P_B|^2 between the momenta in the laboratory system of two experimentally observed particles A and B provides a test for whether an observed mass peak indicates a real resonance rather than nonresonant background or kinematic reflection. The angular distribution of the relative momenta in the center-of-mass system exhibits a forward-backward symmetry in the production and decay of any resonance with a definite parity. This symmetry is not expected in other nonresonant processes and can be expressed without needing angular distributions in terms of the easily measured momenta in the laboratory frame that are already measured and used to calculate the invariant mass of the system. Our test is especially useful for low statistics experiments where the full angular distribution cannot be determined. It can be applied to both fixed-target and collider searches for the Theta^+ and Theta_c pentaquarks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2005arXiv

On a possible tetraquark cousin of the Theta^+

If a narrow Theta^+ pentaquark exists, it is likely that a ud\bar s-ud triquark-diquark configuration is a significant component of its wave function. If so, the mechanism responsible for the binding of a triquark and a diquark is also likely to bind the triquark to an \bar s antiquark. We discuss the expected properties of such a ud\bar s-\bar s tetraquark meson. In particular, we point out that for a 0^+ isoscalar ud\bar s\bar s meson the lowest allowed decay mode is a four-body K K pi pi channel with a small phase space and a distinctive experimental signature.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2002arXiv

Non Standard $η-η^{\prime}$ mixing and the Nonleptonic B and $Λ_b$ Decays to $η$ and $η^{\prime}$

Radial mixing in the pseudoscalar $η-η^{\prime}$ systems can be generated from hyperfine interactions and annihilation terms. For the $η-η^{\prime}$ system we find the effects of radial mixing are appreciable and seriously affect the decay branching ratios for $B \to η(η^{\prime})K(K^*)$, mainly by modifying the $B \to η(η^{\prime})$ form factors. In particular, the effect of radial mixing in conjunction with the interference effects among penguin amplitudes can resolve puzzles in the $B \to η(η^{\prime}) K$ decays. The decay $Λ_b \to Λη(η^{\prime})$ on the other hand is dominated by a single amplitude so that the significant interference effects of B decays are absent here. Moreover, since no $Λ_b \to η(η^{\prime})$ form factors are involved here, the effect of radial mixing is essentially negligible. Hence, unlike the B system, we do not predict a large enhancement of $Λ_b \to Λη^{\prime}$ relative to $Λ_b \to Λη$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1995arXiv

Theories of Non-Experiments in Coherent Decays of Neutral Mesons

Many theoretical calculations of subtle coherent effects in quantum mechanics do not carefully consider the interface between their calculations and experiment. Calculations for gedanken experiments using initial states not satisfied in realistic experiments give results requiring interpretation. Confusion and ambiguities frequently arise. Calculations for time-dependent mixing oscillations describe non-experiments. Physical experiments describe oscillations in space in the laboratory system resulting from interference between waves having the same energy and time dependence; $not$ different momenta and space dependence. Time-dependent oscillations are not observed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1992arXiv

Bose-Einstein Correlations for Mixed Neutral Mesons

Correlations are shown to arise in nonidentical mixed-particle pairs like $K^o \bar K^o$ when observed in identical decay modes like $K_S K_S$ in multiparticle final states containing many partial waves. No enhancement is found in any single partial wave and all partial wave analyses of the s-wave threshold resonance $a_o$ and $f_o$ should give the same results for all decay modes. In CP violation experiments where $B^o - \bar B^o$ pairs are inclusively produced and correlated decays into $ψK_S$ and leptonic modes are observed, the CP-violating lepton asymmetry is enhanced by a factor of two in the kinematic region where Bose enhancement occurs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access