Paper detail

Directed Spontaneous Emission from $N$-atom Extended Ensemble

Coherence and interference play crucial roles in emission and absorption of photons to and from large systems with many atoms. Confusion has arisen because nuclear X-ray physicists and atomic quantum-optics physicists do not understand one another's individual descriptions of related phenomena. Basic physics same for all wave lengths from optical to nuclear gamma ray photons. But different languages are used to describe this physics in different domains. Crucial parameters vary over many orders of magnitude and what is intuitive or counterintuitive varies widely. Differences in parameters arising from differences between coherent emission effects in different domains produce very different results. Unified general treatment of the entire photon spectrum makes basic physics intelligible to all. In the optical region the mean distance between the scattering atoms is much longer than the photon wave length, Dicke superradiant scattering is isotropic and multiple scattering, Fano couplings are important and the lifetimes of intermediate stats are sufficiently short to be negligible. In X-ray scattering the mean distance between atoms is comparable to the photon wave length, Dicke superradiance is concentrated in a forward peak, multiple scattering and Fano effects are negligible, lifetimes are measurably long, speedup shortening the lifetime is important and most of the radiation is not elastically scattered but lost to absorption. Explicit calculations for a one-dimensional array shows the great difference between the case where the photon wave length is much shorter or comparable to the distance between nearest neighbors. A full investigation of the angular distribution and speedup of the intensity for two and three-dimensional scatterers give very different results for the two cases.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.