Paper detail

Why do neutrinos with different masses interfere and oscillate? Why are states with different masses but same energy coherent? Overcoming barrier between particle & condensed matter physics

Neutrino oscillations occur only if it is impossible to determine $ν$ mass by using conservation laws on measurements of nucleon-lepton system absorbing $ν$. No oscillations if $ν$ detector is mass spectrometer. Beam is split into components with different masses entering different counters. For each event only one counter will click and determine $ν$ mass. Condensed matter physics needed to describe the $ν$ detector, show it is not a mass spectrometer and identify which properties of the incident $ν$ are unobservable. Relativistic quantum field theory can only describe $ν$ wave function entering detector but not large uncertain momentum transfers to detector nor associated energy-momentum asymmetry. Absorption of incident $ν$'s with different momenta but same energy leaves no trace of initial $ν$ momentum difference in finite-size $ν$ detector with effectively infinite mass at rest in laboratory. Undetectable recoil-free momentum is transferred to the detector with negligible energy transfer. The Debye-Waller factor common in X-ray diffraction by crystals gives probability that absorbing $ν$'s with different momenta produce same nucleon-charged-lepton final state. Oscillations in time described in textbooks as interference between $ν$ states with different energies not observable in realistic experiments. Different energy $ν$'s not coherent because energy can be determined by measurements on initial and final states. Experiments detecting $ν$ produced by $πto μν$ decay observe no electrons even though $ν$ mass eigenstates produce electrons. Electron amplitude canceled by interference between amplitudes from different $ν$ mass eigenstates with same energy and different momenta entering massive detector.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.