Paper detail

Universal consistency of Wasserstein $k$-NN classifier: Negative and Positive Results

The Wasserstein distance provides a notion of dissimilarities between probability measures, which has recent applications in learning of structured data with varying size such as images and text documents. In this work, we study the $k$-nearest neighbor classifier ($k$-NN) of probability measures under the Wasserstein distance. We show that the $k$-NN classifier is not universally consistent on the space of measures supported in $(0,1)$. As any Euclidean ball contains a copy of $(0,1)$, one should not expect to obtain universal consistency without some restriction on the base metric space, or the Wasserstein space itself. To this end, via the notion of $σ$-finite metric dimension, we show that the $k$-NN classifier is universally consistent on spaces of measures supported in a $σ$-uniformly discrete set. In addition, by studying the geodesic structures of the Wasserstein spaces for $p=1$ and $p=2$, we show that the $k$-NN classifier is universally consistent on the space of measures supported on a finite set, the space of Gaussian measures, and the space of measures with densities expressed as finite wavelet series.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.