Paper detail

Thermal Conductance Across Harmonic-matched Epitaxial Al-sapphire Heterointerfaces

A unified understanding of interfacial thermal transport is missing due to the complicated nature of interfaces which involves complex factors such as interfacial bonding, interfacial mixing, surface chemistry, crystal orientation, roughness, contamination, and interfacial disorder. This is especially true for metal nonmetal interfaces which incorporate multiple fundamental heat transport mechanisms such as elastic and inelastic phonon scattering as well as electron phonon coupling in the metal and across the interface. All these factors jointly affect thermal boundary conductance (TBC). As a result, the experimentally measured interfaces may not be the same as the ideally modelled interfaces, thus obfuscating any conclusions drawn from experimental and modeling comparisons. This work provides a systematic study of interfacial thermal conductance across well controlled and ultraclean epitaxial (111) Al parallel (0001) sapphire interfaces, known as harmonic matched interface. A comparison with thermal models such as atomistic Green s function (AGF) and a nonequilibrium Landauer approach shows that elastic phonon scattering dominates the interfacial thermal transport of Al sapphire interface. By scaling the TBC with the Al heat capacity, a nearly constant transmission coefficient is observed, indicating that the phonons on the Al side limits the Al sapphire TBC. This nearly constant transmission coefficient validates the assumptions in AGF and nonequilibrium Landauer calculations. Our work not only provides a benchmark for interfacial thermal conductance across metal nonmetal interfaces and enables a quantitative study of TBC to validate theoretical thermal carrier transport mechanisms, but also acts as a reference when studying how other factors impact TBC.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.