Paper detail

Search for anomalous $WWγ$ and $WWZ$ couplings with polarized $e$-beam at the LHeC

We examine the potential of the $ep\toν_{e}qγX$ and $ep\toν_{e}qZX$ processes to search for the anomalous couplings of $WWγ$ and $WWZ$ vertices at the LHeC with the electron beam energy of $E_{e}=60$ GeV and $E_{e}=140$ GeV. The difference of maximum and minimum bounds on the anomalous couplings, ($δΔκ_γ$, $δλ_γ$) and ($δΔκ_{Z}$, $δλ_{Z}$) are obtained as ($0.990$, $0.122$) and ($0.362$, $0.012$) without electron beam polarization at the beam energy of $E_{e}=140$ GeV for an integrated luminosity of $L_{int}=100$ fb$^{-1}$, respectively. With the possibility of $e-$beam polarization, we obtain more improved results as ($0.975$, $0.118$) and ($0.285$, $0.009$) for ($δΔκ_γ, δλ_γ$) and ($δΔκ_{Z}, δλ_{Z}$), respectively. The results are found to be comparable with the current experimental limits obtained from two-parameter analysis at the lepton and hadron colliders. It is found that the limits on the anomalous couplings ($Δκ_{Z}$, $λ_{Z}$) through the process $ep\toν_{e}qZX$ at the LHeC can further improve the current experimental limits.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.