Paper detail

Robust incorporation in multi-donor patches created using atomic-precision advanced manufacturing

Atomic-precision advanced manufacturing enables the placement of dopant atoms within $\pm$1 lattice site in crystalline Si. However, it has recently been shown that reaction kinetics can introduce uncertainty in whether a single donor will incorporate at all in a minimal 3-dimer lithographic window. In this work, we explore the combined impact of lithographic variation and stochastic kinetics on P incorporation as the size of such a window is increased. We augment a kinetic model for PH$_3$ dissociation leading to P incorporation on Si(100)-2$\times$1 to include barriers for reactions across distinct dimer rows. Using this model, we demonstrate that even for a window consisting of 2$\times$3 silicon dimers, the probability that at least one donor incorporates is nearly unity. We also examine the impact of size of the lithographic window, finding that the incorporation fraction saturates to $δ$-layer like coverage as the circumference-to-area ratio approaches zero. We predict that this incorporation fraction depends strongly on the dosage of the precursor, and that the standard deviation of the number of incorporations scales as $\sim \sqrt{n}$, as would be expected for a series of largely independent incorporation events. Finally, we characterize an array of experimentally prepared multi-donor lithographic windows and use our kinetic model to study variability due to the observed lithographic roughness, predicting a negligible impact on incorporation statistics. We find good agreement between our model and the inferred incorporation in these windows from scanning tunneling microscope measurements, indicating the robustness of atomic-precision advanced manufacturing to errors in patterning for multi-donor patches.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.