Paper detail

Realizing split-pulse x-ray photon correlation spectroscopy to measure ultrafast dynamics in complex matter

Split-pulse x-ray photon correlation spectroscopy has been proposed as one of the unique capabilities made possible with the x-ray free electron lasers. It enables characterization of atomic scale structural dynamics that dictates the macroscopic properties of various disordered material systems. Central to the experimental concept are x-ray optics that are capable of splitting individual coherent femtosecond x-ray pulse into two distinct pulses, introduce an adjustable time delay between them, and then recombine the two pulses at the sample position such that they generate two coherent scattering patterns in rapid succession. Recent developments in such optics showed that, while true 'amplitude splitting' optics at hard x-ray wavelengths remains a technical challenge, wavefront and wavelength splitting are both feasible, able to deliver two micron sized focused beams to the sample with sufficient relative stability. Here, we however show that the conventional approach to speckle visibility spectroscopy using these beam splitting techniques can be problematic, even leading to a decoupling of speckle visibility and material dynamics. In response, we discuss the details of the experimental approaches and data analysis protocols for addressing issues caused by subtle beam dissimilarities for both wavefront and wavelength splitting setups. We also show that in some scattering geometries, the Q-space mismatch can be resolved by using two beams of slightly different incidence angle and slightly different wavelengths at the same time. Instead of measuring the visibility of weak speckle patterns, the time correlation in sample structure is encoded in the 'side band' of the spatial autocorrelation of the summed speckle patterns, and can be retrieved straightforwardly from the experimental data. We demonstrate this with a numerical simulation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.