Paper detail

Reactor electron antineutrino disappearance in the Double Chooz experiment

The Double Chooz experiment has observed 8,249 candidate electron antineutrino events in 227.93 live days with 33.71 GW-ton-years (reactor power x detector mass x livetime) exposure using a 10.3 cubic meter fiducial volume detector located at 1050 m from the reactor cores of the Chooz nuclear power plant in France. The expectation in case of theta13 = 0 is 8,937 events. The deficit is interpreted as evidence of electron antineutrino disappearance. From a rate plus spectral shape analysis we find sin^2 2θ13 = 0.109 \pm 0.030(stat) \pm 0.025(syst). The data exclude the no-oscillation hypothesis at 99.8% CL (2.9σ).

preprint2012arXivOpen access
Y. AbeC. AberleJ. C. dos AnjosJ. C. BarriereM. BergevinA. BernsteinT. J. C. BezerraL. BezrukhovE. BlucherN. S. BowdenC. BuckJ. BusenitzA. CabreraE. CadenL. CamilleriR. CarrM. CerradaP. -J. ChangP. ChimentiT. ClassenA. P. CollinE. ConoverJ. M. ConradJ. I. Crespo-AnadónK. CrumA. CucoanesM. V. D'AgostinoE. DamonJ. V. DawsonS. DazeleyD. DietrichZ. DjurcicM. DracosV. DurandJ. EbertY. EfremenkoM. ElnimrA. EtenkoM. FallotM. FechnerF. von FeilitzschJ. FeldeD. FrancoA. J. FrankeM. FrankeH. FurutaR. GamaI. Gil-BotellaL. GiotM. Goger-NeffL. F. G. GonzalezM. C. GoodmanJ. TM. GoonD. GreinerN. HaagC. HagnerT. HaraF. X. HartmannJ. HaserA. HatzikoutelisT. HayakawaM. HofmannG. A. Horton-SmithA. HourlierM. IshitsukaJ. JochumC. JolletC. L. JonesF. KaetherL. N. KalousisY. KamyshkovD. M. KaplanT. KawasakiG. KeeferE. KempH. de KerretY. KibeT. KonnoD. KrynM. KuzeT. LachenmaierC. E. LaneC. LangbrandtnerT. LasserreA. LetourneauD. LhuillierH. P. Lima JrM. LindnerJ. M. López-CastanõJ. M. LoSeccoB. K. LubsandorzhievS. LuchtD. McKeeJ. MaedaC. N. MaesanoC. MarianiJ. MaricicJ. MartinoT. MatsubaraG. MentionA. MeregagliaT. MileticR. MilincicH. MiyataTh. A. MuellerY. NagasakaK. NakajimaP. NovellaM. ObolenskyL. OberauerA. OnillonA. OsbornI. OstrovskiyC. PalomaresI. M. PepeS. PerassoP. PerrinP. PfahlerA. PortaW. PotzelJ. ReichenbacherB. ReinholdA. RemotoM. RohlingR. RoncinS. RothY. SakamotoR. SantorelliF. SatoS. SchonertS. SchoppmannT. SchwetzM. H. ShaevitzS. ShimojimaD. ShresthaJ. -L. SidaV. SinevM. SkorokhvatovE. SmithJ. SpitzA. StahlI. StancuL. F. F. StokesM. StraitA. StukenF. SuekaneS. SukhotinT. SumiyoshiY. SunR. SvobodaK. TeraoA. TonazzoM. ToupsH. H. Trinh ThiG. ValdiviessoC. VeyssiereS. WagnerH. WatanabeB. WhiteC. WiebuschL. WinslowM. WorcesterM. WurmF. YermiaV. Zimmer
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Y. AbeC. AberleJ. C. dos AnjosJ. C. BarriereM. BergevinA. BernsteinT. J. C. BezerraL. BezrukhovE. BlucherN. S. BowdenC. BuckJ. BusenitzA. CabreraE. CadenL. CamilleriR. CarrM. CerradaP. -J. ChangP. ChimentiT. ClassenA. P. CollinE. ConoverJ. M. ConradJ. I. Crespo-AnadónK. CrumA. CucoanesM. V. D'AgostinoE. DamonJ. V. DawsonS. DazeleyD. DietrichZ. DjurcicM. DracosV. DurandJ. EbertY. EfremenkoM. ElnimrA. EtenkoM. FallotM. FechnerF. von FeilitzschJ. FeldeD. FrancoA. J. FrankeM. FrankeH. FurutaR. GamaI. Gil-BotellaL. GiotM. Goger-NeffL. F. G. GonzalezM. C. GoodmanJ. TM. GoonD. GreinerN. HaagC. HagnerT. HaraF. X. HartmannJ. HaserA. HatzikoutelisT. HayakawaM. HofmannG. A. Horton-SmithA. HourlierM. IshitsukaJ. JochumC. JolletC. L. JonesF. KaetherL. N. KalousisY. KamyshkovD. M. KaplanT. KawasakiG. KeeferE. KempH. de KerretY. KibeT. KonnoD. KrynM. KuzeT. LachenmaierC. E. LaneC. LangbrandtnerT. LasserreA. LetourneauD. LhuillierH. P. Lima JrM. LindnerJ. M. López-CastanõJ. M. LoSeccoB. K. LubsandorzhievS. LuchtD. McKeeJ. MaedaC. N. MaesanoC. MarianiJ. MaricicJ. MartinoT. MatsubaraG. MentionA. MeregagliaT. MileticR. MilincicH. MiyataTh. A. MuellerY. NagasakaK. NakajimaP. NovellaM. ObolenskyL. OberauerA. OnillonA. OsbornI. OstrovskiyC. PalomaresI. M. PepeS. PerassoP. PerrinP. PfahlerA. PortaW. PotzelJ. ReichenbacherB. ReinholdA. RemotoM. RohlingR. RoncinS. RothY. SakamotoR. SantorelliF. SatoS. SchonertS. SchoppmannT. SchwetzM. H. ShaevitzS. ShimojimaD. ShresthaJ. -L. SidaV. SinevM. SkorokhvatovE. SmithJ. SpitzA. StahlI. StancuL. F. F. StokesM. StraitA. StukenF. SuekaneS. SukhotinT. SumiyoshiY. SunR. SvobodaK. TeraoA. TonazzoM. ToupsH. H. Trinh ThiG. ValdiviessoC. VeyssiereS. WagnerH. WatanabeB. WhiteC. WiebuschL. WinslowM. WorcesterM. WurmF. YermiaV. Zimmer

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.