Paper detail

Probing hundreds of individual quantum defects in polycrystalline and amorphous alumina

Quantum two-level systems (TLSs) are present in the materials of qubits and are considered defects because they limit qubit coherence. For superconducting qubits, the quintessential Josephson junction barrier is made of amorphous alumina, which hosts TLSs. However, TLSs are not understood generally -- either structurally or in atomic composition. In this study, we greatly extend the quantitative data available on TLSs by reporting on the physical dipole moment in two alumina types: polycrystalline $\mathrm{\mathrm{γ-Al}_{2}\mathrm{O}_{3}}$ and amorphous $\mathrm{a-Al}\mathrm{O_{x}}$. To obtain the dipole moments $p_z$, rather from the less-structural coupling parameter g, we tune individual TLSs with an external electric field to extract the $p_z$ of the TLSs in a cavity QED system. We find a clear difference in the dipole moment distribution from the film types, indicating a difference in TLS structures. A large sample of approximately 400 individual TLSs are analyzed from the polycrystalline film type. Their dipoles along the growth direction $p_z$ have a mean value of 2.6$\pm$0.3 Debye (D) and standard deviation $σ$ = 1.6$\pm$0.2 D . The material distribution fits well to a single Gaussian function. Approximately 200 individual TLSs are analyzed from amorphous films. Both the mean $p_z$ =4.6$\pm$0.5 D and $σ$ =2.5$\pm$0.3 D are larger. Amorphous alumina also has some very large $p_z$, > 8.6 D, in contrast to polycrystalline which has none of this moment. These large moments agree only with oxygen-based TLS models. Based on data and the candidate models (delocalized O and hydrogen-based TLSs), we find polycrystalline alumina has smaller ratio of O-based to H-based TLS than amorphous alumina.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.