Paper detail

Penning-trap mass measurements of the deuteron and the HD+ molecular ion

The masses of the lightest atomic nuclei and the electron mass are interlinked and are crucial in a wide range of research fields, with their values affecting observables in atomic, molecular and neutrino physics as well as metrology. The most precise values for these fundamental parameters come from Penning-trap mass spectrometry, which achieves relative mass uncertainties in the range of $10^{-11}$. However, redundancy checks using data from different experiments reveal significant inconsistencies in the masses of the proton ($m_p$), the deuteron ($m_d$) and helion ($m_\text{he}$), amounting to $5$ standard deviations for the term $Δ=m_p+m_d-m_{\text{he}}$, which suggests that the uncertainty of these values may have been underestimated. Here we present results from absolute mass measurements of the deuteron and the ${HD}^+$ molecular ion against $^{12}C$ as a mass reference. Our value for the deuteron $m_d=2.013\,553\,212\,535 (17)$u supersedes the precision of the literature value by a factor of $2.4$ and deviates from this by $4.8$ standard deviations. With a relative uncertainty of $8$ parts per trillion (ppt) this is the most precise mass value measured directly in atomic mass units. Furthermore, the measurement of the ${HD}^+$ molecular ion, $m({HD}^+)=3.021\,378\,241\,561\,(61)$u, not only allows for a rigorous consistency check of our measurements of the masses of the deuteron (this work) and proton, but also establishes an additional link for the masses of tritium and helium-3 to the atomic mass unit. Combined with a recent measurement of the deuteron-to-proton mass ratio the uncertainty of the reference value of $m_p$ can be reduced by a factor of three. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Nature. The final authenticated version is available online at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2628-7

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.