Researcher profile

Fabian Heiße

Fabian Heiße contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Direct Bound-Electron $g$ factor Difference Measurement with Coupled Ions

The quantum electrodynamic (QED) description of light-and-matter interaction is one of the most fundamental theories of physics and has been shown to be in excellent agreement with experimental results. Specifically, measurements of the electronic magnetic moment (or $g$ factor) of highly charged ions (HCI) in Penning traps can provide a stringent probe for QED, testing the Standard model in the strongest electromagnetic fields. When studying the difference of isotopes, even the intricate effects stemming from the nucleus can be resolved and tested as, due to the identical electron configuration, many common QED contributions do not have to be considered. Experimentally however, this becomes quickly limited, particularly by the precision of the ion masses or the achievable magnetic field stability. Here we report on a novel measurement technique that overcomes both of these limitations by co-trapping two HCIs in a Penning trap and measuring the difference of their $g$ factors directly. The resulting correlation of magnetic field fluctuations leads to drastically higher precision. We use a dual Ramsey-type measurement scheme with the ions locked on a common magnetron orbit, separated by only a few hundred micrometres, to extract the coherent spin precession frequency difference. We have measured the isotopic shift of the bound electron $g$ factor of the neon isotopes of $^{20}$Ne$^{9+}$ and $^{22}$Ne$^{9+}$ to 0.56 parts-per-trillion ($5.6 \cdot 10^{-13}$) precision relative to their $g$ factors, which is an improvement of more than two orders of magnitude compared to state-of-the-art techniques. This resolves the QED contribution to the nuclear recoil for the very first time and accurately validates the corresponding theory. Furthermore, the agreement with theory allows setting constraints for a fifth-force, resulting from Higgs-portal-type dark-matter interactions.

preprint2022arXiv

Penning-trap mass measurements of the deuteron and the HD+ molecular ion

The masses of the lightest atomic nuclei and the electron mass are interlinked and are crucial in a wide range of research fields, with their values affecting observables in atomic, molecular and neutrino physics as well as metrology. The most precise values for these fundamental parameters come from Penning-trap mass spectrometry, which achieves relative mass uncertainties in the range of $10^{-11}$. However, redundancy checks using data from different experiments reveal significant inconsistencies in the masses of the proton ($m_p$), the deuteron ($m_d$) and helion ($m_\text{he}$), amounting to $5$ standard deviations for the term $Δ=m_p+m_d-m_{\text{he}}$, which suggests that the uncertainty of these values may have been underestimated. Here we present results from absolute mass measurements of the deuteron and the ${HD}^+$ molecular ion against $^{12}C$ as a mass reference. Our value for the deuteron $m_d=2.013\,553\,212\,535 (17)$u supersedes the precision of the literature value by a factor of $2.4$ and deviates from this by $4.8$ standard deviations. With a relative uncertainty of $8$ parts per trillion (ppt) this is the most precise mass value measured directly in atomic mass units. Furthermore, the measurement of the ${HD}^+$ molecular ion, $m({HD}^+)=3.021\,378\,241\,561\,(61)$u, not only allows for a rigorous consistency check of our measurements of the masses of the deuteron (this work) and proton, but also establishes an additional link for the masses of tritium and helium-3 to the atomic mass unit. Combined with a recent measurement of the deuteron-to-proton mass ratio the uncertainty of the reference value of $m_p$ can be reduced by a factor of three. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Nature. The final authenticated version is available online at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2628-7

preprint2020arXiv

High-precision mass spectrometer for light ions

The precise knowledge of the atomic masses of light atomic nuclei, e.g. the proton, deuteron, triton and helion, is of great importance for several fundamental tests in physics. However, the latest high-precision measurements of these masses carried out at different mass spectrometers indicate an inconsistency of five standard deviations. To determine the masses of the lightest ions with a relative precision of a few parts per trillion and investigate this mass problem a cryogenic multi-Penning trap setup, LIONTRAP (Light ION TRAP), was constructed. This allows an independent and more precise determination of the relevant atomic masses by measuring the cyclotron frequency of single trapped ions in comparison to that of a single carbon ion. In this paper the measurement concept and the first doubly compensated cylindrical electrode Penning trap, are presented. Moreover, the analysis of the first measurement campaigns of the proton's and oxygen's atomic mass is described in detail, resulting in mp = 1.007 276 466 598 (33) u and m(16O)= 15.994 914 619 37 (87) u. The results on these data sets have already been presented in [F. Heisse et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 033001 (2017)]. For the proton's atomic mass, the uncertainty was improved by a factor of three compared to the 2014 CODATA value.