Paper detail

Online detection of local abrupt changes in high-dimensional Gaussian graphical models

The problem of identifying change points in high-dimensional Gaussian graphical models (GGMs) in an online fashion is of interest, due to new applications in biology, economics and social sciences. The offline version of the problem, where all the data are a priori available, has led to a number of methods and associated algorithms involving regularized loss functions. However, for the online version, there is currently only a single work in the literature that develops a sequential testing procedure and also studies its asymptotic false alarm probability and power. The latter test is best suited for the detection of change points driven by global changes in the structure of the precision matrix of the GGM, in the sense that many edges are involved. Nevertheless, in many practical settings the change point is driven by local changes, in the sense that only a small number of edges exhibit changes. To that end, we develop a novel test to address this problem that is based on the $\ell_\infty$ norm of the normalized covariance matrix of an appropriately selected portion of incoming data. The study of the asymptotic distribution of the proposed test statistic under the null (no presence of a change point) and the alternative (presence of a change point) hypotheses requires new technical tools that examine maxima of graph-dependent Gaussian random variables, and that of independent interest. It is further shown that these tools lead to the imposition of mild regularity conditions for key model parameters, instead of more stringent ones required by leveraging previously used tools in related problems in the literature. Numerical work on synthetic data illustrates the good performance of the proposed detection procedure both in terms of computational and statistical efficiency across numerous experimental settings.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.