Paper detail

Nonparametric Maximum Entropy Probability Density Estimation

Given a sample of independent and identically distributed random variables, a novel nonparametric maximum entropy method is presented to estimate the underlying continuous univariate probability density function (pdf). Estimates are found by maximizing a log-likelihood function based on single order statistics after transforming through a sequence of trial cumulative distribution functions that iteratively improve using a Monte Carlo random search method. Improvement is quantified by assessing the random variables against the statistical properties of sampled uniform random data. Quality is determined using an empirically derived scoring function that is scaled to be sample size invariant. The scoring function identifies atypical fluctuations, for which threshold values are set to define objective criteria that prevent under-fitting as trial iterations continue to improve the model pdf, and, stopping the iteration cycle before over-fitting occurs. No prior knowledge about the data is required. An ensemble of pdf models is used to reflect uncertainties due to statistical fluctuations in random samples, and the quality of the estimates is visualized using scaled residual quantile plots that show deviations from size-invariant statistics. These considerations result in a tractable method that holistically employs key principles of random variables and their statistical properties combined with employing orthogonal basis functions and data-driven adaptive algorithms. Benchmark tests show that the pdf estimates readily converge to the true pdf as sample size increases. Robust results are demonstrated on several test probability densities that include cases with discontinuities, multi-resolution scales, heavy tails and singularities in the pdf, suggesting a generally applicable approach for statistical inference.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.