Paper detail

On $C_J$ and $C_T$ in the Gross-Neveu and $O(N)$ Models

We apply large $N$ diagrammatic techniques for theories with double-trace interactions to the leading corrections to $C_J$, the coefficient of a conserved current two-point function, and $C_T$, the coefficient of the stress-energy tensor two-point function. We study in detail two famous conformal field theories in continuous dimensions, the scalar $O(N)$ model and the Gross-Neveu model. For the $O(N)$ model, where the answers for the leading large $N$ corrections to $C_J$ and $C_T$ were derived long ago using analytic bootstrap, we show that the diagrammatic approach reproduces them correctly. We also carry out a new perturbative test of these results using the $O(N)$ symmetric cubic scalar theory in $6-ε$ dimensions. We go on to apply the diagrammatic method to the Gross-Neveu model, finding explicit formulae for the leading corrections to $C_J$ and $C_T$ as a function of dimension. We check these large $N$ results using regular perturbation theory for the Gross-Neveu model in $2+ε$ dimensions and the Gross-Neveu-Yukawa model in $4-ε$ dimensions. For small values of $N$, we use Pade approximants based on the $4-ε$ and $2+ε$ expansions to estimate the values of $C_J$ and $C_T$ in $d=3$. For the $O(N)$ model our estimates are close to those found using the conformal bootstrap. For the GN model, our estimates suggest that, even when $N$ is small, $C_T$ differs by no more than $2\%$ from that in the theory of free fermions. We find that the inequality $C_T^{\textrm{UV}} > C_T^{\textrm{IR}}$ applies both to the GN and the scalar $O(N)$ models in $d=3$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.