Paper detail

NEXO: Neutrinoless double beta decay search beyond $10^{28}$ year half-life sensitivity

The nEXO neutrinoless double beta decay experiment is designed to use a time projection chamber and 5000 kg of isotopically enriched liquid xenon to search for the decay in $^{136}$Xe. Progress in the detector design, paired with higher fidelity in its simulation and an advanced data analysis, based on the one used for the final results of EXO-200, produce a sensitivity prediction that exceeds the half-life of $10^{28}$ years. Specifically, improvements have been made in the understanding of production of scintillation photons and charge as well as of their transport and reconstruction in the detector. The more detailed knowledge of the detector construction has been paired with more assays for trace radioactivity in different materials. In particular, the use of custom electroformed copper is now incorporated in the design, leading to a substantial reduction in backgrounds from the intrinsic radioactivity of detector materials. Furthermore, a number of assumptions from previous sensitivity projections have gained further support from interim work validating the nEXO experiment concept. Together these improvements and updates suggest that the nEXO experiment will reach a half-life sensitivity of $1.35\times 10^{28}$ yr at 90% confidence level in 10 years of data taking, covering the parameter space associated with the inverted neutrino mass ordering, along with a significant portion of the parameter space for the normal ordering scenario, for almost all nuclear matrix elements. The effects of backgrounds deviating from the nominal values used for the projections are also illustrated, concluding that the nEXO design is robust against a number of imperfections of the model.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
nEXO CollaborationG. AdhikariS. Al KharusiE. AngelicoG. AntonI. J. ArnquistI. BadhreesJ. BaneV. BelovE. P. BernardT. BhattaA. BolotnikovP. A. BreurJ. P. BrodskyE. BrownT. BrunnerE. CadenG. F. CaoL. CaoC. ChambersB. ChanaS. A. CharleboisD. ChernyakM. ChiuB. ClevelandR. CollisterS. A. CzyzJ. DalmassonT. DanielsL. DarrochR. DeVoeM. L. di VacriJ. DillingY. Y. DingA. DolgolenkoM. J. DolinskiA. DragoneJ. EcheversM. ElbeltagiL. FabrisD. FairbankW. FairbankJ. FarineS. FerraraS. FeyzbakhshY. S. FuG. GallinaP. GautamG. GiacominiW. Gillis C. GingrasD. GoeldiR. GorneaG. GrattaC. A. HardyK. HarouakaM. HeffnerE. W. HoppeA. HouseA. IversonA. JamilM. JewellX. S. JiangA. KarelinL. J. KaufmanI. KotovR. KrückenA. KuchenkovK. S. KumarY. LanA. LarsonK. G. LeachB. G. LenardoD. S. LeonardG. LiS. LiZ. LiC. LicciardiR. LindsayR. MacLellanM. MahtabP. Martel-DionJ. MasbouN. MassacretT. McElroyK. McMichaelM. Medina PeregrinaT. MichelB. MongD. C. MooreK. MurrayJ. NattressC. R. NatzkeR. J. NewbyK. NiF. NoletO. NusairJ. C. Nzobadila OndzeK. OdgersA. OdianJ. L. OrrellG. S. OrtegaC. T. OvermanS. ParentA. PernaA. PiepkeA. PocarJ-F. PratteN. PrielV. RadekaE. RaguzinG. J. RamonnyeT. RaoH. RasiwalaS. ResciaF. RetièreJ. RinguetteV. RiotT. RossignolP. C. RowsonN. RoyR. SaldanhaS. SangiorgioX. ShangA. K. SomaF. SpadoniV. StekhanovX. L. SunM. TarkaS. ThibadoA. TidballJ. ToddT. TotevS. TriambakR. H. M. TsangT. TsangF. VachonV. VeeraraghavanS. VielC. Vivo-VilchesP. VogelJ-L. VuilleumierM. WagenpfeilT. WagerM. WalentK. WambaQ. WangW. WeiL. J. WenU. WichoskiS. WildeM. WorcesterS. X. WuW. H. WuX. WuQ. XiaW. YanH. YangL. YangO. ZeldovichJ. ZhaoT. Ziegler

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access161 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

nEXO CollaborationG. AdhikariS. Al KharusiE. AngelicoG. AntonI. J. ArnquistI. BadhreesJ. BaneV. BelovE. P. BernardT. BhattaA. BolotnikovP. A. BreurJ. P. BrodskyE. BrownT. BrunnerE. CadenG. F. CaoL. CaoC. ChambersB. ChanaS. A. CharleboisD. ChernyakM. ChiuB. ClevelandR. CollisterS. A. CzyzJ. DalmassonT. DanielsL. DarrochR. DeVoeM. L. di VacriJ. DillingY. Y. DingA. DolgolenkoM. J. DolinskiA. DragoneJ. EcheversM. ElbeltagiL. FabrisD. FairbankW. FairbankJ. FarineS. FerraraS. FeyzbakhshY. S. FuG. GallinaP. GautamG. GiacominiW. Gillis C. GingrasD. GoeldiR. GorneaG. GrattaC. A. HardyK. HarouakaM. HeffnerE. W. HoppeA. HouseA. IversonA. JamilM. JewellX. S. JiangA. KarelinL. J. KaufmanI. KotovR. KrückenA. KuchenkovK. S. KumarY. LanA. LarsonK. G. LeachB. G. LenardoD. S. LeonardG. LiS. LiZ. LiC. LicciardiR. LindsayR. MacLellanM. MahtabP. Martel-DionJ. MasbouN. MassacretT. McElroyK. McMichaelM. Medina PeregrinaT. MichelB. MongD. C. MooreK. MurrayJ. NattressC. R. NatzkeR. J. NewbyK. NiF. NoletO. NusairJ. C. Nzobadila OndzeK. OdgersA. OdianJ. L. OrrellG. S. OrtegaC. T. OvermanS. ParentA. PernaA. PiepkeA. PocarJ-F. PratteN. PrielV. RadekaE. RaguzinG. J. RamonnyeT. RaoH. RasiwalaS. ResciaF. RetièreJ. RinguetteV. RiotT. RossignolP. C. RowsonN. RoyR. SaldanhaS. SangiorgioX. ShangA. K. SomaF. SpadoniV. StekhanovX. L. SunM. TarkaS. ThibadoA. TidballJ. ToddT. TotevS. TriambakR. H. M. TsangT. TsangF. VachonV. VeeraraghavanS. VielC. Vivo-VilchesP. VogelJ-L. VuilleumierM. WagenpfeilT. WagerM. WalentK. WambaQ. WangW. WeiL. J. WenU. WichoskiS. WildeM. WorcesterS. X. WuW. H. WuX. WuQ. XiaW. YanH. YangL. YangO. ZeldovichJ. ZhaoT. Ziegler

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.