Paper detail

Multiple Improvements of Multiple Imputation Likelihood Ratio Tests

Multiple imputation (MI) inference handles missing data by imputing the missing values $m$ times, and then combining the results from the $m$ complete-data analyses. However, the existing method for combining likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) has multiple defects: (i) the combined test statistic can be negative, but its null distribution is approximated by an $F$-distribution; (ii) it is not invariant to re-parametrization; (iii) it fails to ensure monotonic power owing to its use of an inconsistent estimator of the fraction of missing information (FMI) under the alternative hypothesis; and (iv) it requires nontrivial access to the LRT statistic as a function of parameters instead of data sets. We show, using both theoretical derivations and empirical investigations, that essentially all of these problems can be straightforwardly addressed if we are willing to perform an additional LRT by stacking the $m$ completed data sets as one big completed data set. This enables users to implement the MI LRT without modifying the complete-data procedure. A particularly intriguing finding is that the FMI can be estimated consistently by an LRT statistic for testing whether the $m$ completed data sets can be regarded effectively as samples coming from a common model. Practical guidelines are provided based on an extensive comparison of existing MI tests. Issues related to nuisance parameters are also discussed.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.