Paper detail

Locally $p$-admissible measures on $\mathbb{R}$

In this note we show that locally $p$-admissible measures on $\mathbb{R}$ necessarily come from local Muckenhoupt $A_p$ weights. In the proof we employ the corresponding characterization of global $p$-admissible measures on $\mathbb{R}$ in terms of global $A_p$ weights due to Björn, Buckley and Keith, together with tools from analysis in metric spaces, more specifically preservation of the doubling condition and Poincaré inequalities under flattening, due to Durand-Cartagena and Li. As a consequence, the class of locally $p$-admissible weights on $\mathbb{R}$ is invariant under addition and satisfies the lattice property. We also show that measures that are $p$-admissible on an interval can be partially extended by periodical reflections to global $p$-admissible measures. Surprisingly, the $p$-admissibility has to hold on a larger interval than the reflected one, and an example shows that this is necessary.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.