Paper detail

A candidate to the densest packing with equal balls in the Thurston geometries

The ball (or sphere) packing problem with equal balls, without any symmetry assumption, in a $3$-dimensional space of constant curvature was settled by Böröczky and Florian for the hyperbolic space $\HYP$ in \cite{BF64} and by proving the famous Kepler conjecture by Hales \cite{H} for the Euclidean space $\EUC$. The goal of this paper is to extend the problem of finding the densest geodesic ball (or sphere) packing for the other $3$-dimensional homogeneous geometries (Thurston geometries) $$ \SXR,~\HXR,~\SLR,~\NIL,~\SOL, $$ where a transitive symmetry group of the ball packing is assumed, one of the discrete isometry groups of the considered space. Moreover, we describe a candidate of the densest geodesic ball packing. The greatest density until now is $\approx 0.85327613$ that is not realized by packing with equal balls of the hyperbolic space $\HYP$. However, it attains e.g. at horoball packing of $\overline{\bH}^3$ where the ideal centres of horoballs lie on the absolute figure of $\overline{\bH}^3$ inducing the regular ideal simplex tiling $(3,3,6)$ by its Coxeter-Schläfli symbol. In this work we present a geodesic ball packing in the $\SXR$ geometry whose density is $\approx 0.87499429$. The extremal configuration is described in Theorem 2.8, Our conjecture and further remarks are summarized in Section 3.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.