Paper detail

Information Recovery from Pairwise Measurements

This paper is concerned with jointly recovering $n$ node-variables $\left\{ x_{i}\right\}_{1\leq i\leq n}$ from a collection of pairwise difference measurements. Imagine we acquire a few observations taking the form of $x_{i}-x_{j}$; the observation pattern is represented by a measurement graph $\mathcal{G}$ with an edge set $\mathcal{E}$ such that $x_{i}-x_{j}$ is observed if and only if $(i,j)\in\mathcal{E}$. To account for noisy measurements in a general manner, we model the data acquisition process by a set of channels with given input/output transition measures. Employing information-theoretic tools applied to channel decoding problems, we develop a \emph{unified} framework to characterize the fundamental recovery criterion, which accommodates general graph structures, alphabet sizes, and channel transition measures. In particular, our results isolate a family of \emph{minimum} \emph{channel divergence measures} to characterize the degree of measurement corruption, which together with the size of the minimum cut of $\mathcal{G}$ dictates the feasibility of exact information recovery. For various homogeneous graphs, the recovery condition depends almost only on the edge sparsity of the measurement graph irrespective of other graphical metrics; alternatively, the minimum sample complexity required for these graphs scales like \[ \text{minimum sample complexity }\asymp\frac{n\log n}{\mathsf{Hel}_{1/2}^{\min}} \] for certain information metric $\mathsf{Hel}_{1/2}^{\min}$ defined in the main text, as long as the alphabet size is not super-polynomial in $n$. We apply our general theory to three concrete applications, including the stochastic block model, the outlier model, and the haplotype assembly problem. Our theory leads to order-wise tight recovery conditions for all these scenarios.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors6 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.