Paper detail

Improving Meta-Learning Generalization with Activation-Based Early-Stopping

Meta-Learning algorithms for few-shot learning aim to train neural networks capable of generalizing to novel tasks using only a few examples. Early-stopping is critical for performance, halting model training when it reaches optimal generalization to the new task distribution. Early-stopping mechanisms in Meta-Learning typically rely on measuring the model performance on labeled examples from a meta-validation set drawn from the training (source) dataset. This is problematic in few-shot transfer learning settings, where the meta-test set comes from a different target dataset (OOD) and can potentially have a large distributional shift with the meta-validation set. In this work, we propose Activation Based Early-stopping (ABE), an alternative to using validation-based early-stopping for meta-learning. Specifically, we analyze the evolution, during meta-training, of the neural activations at each hidden layer, on a small set of unlabelled support examples from a single task of the target tasks distribution, as this constitutes a minimal and justifiably accessible information from the target problem. Our experiments show that simple, label agnostic statistics on the activations offer an effective way to estimate how the target generalization evolves over time. At each hidden layer, we characterize the activation distributions, from their first and second order moments, then further summarized along the feature dimensions, resulting in a compact yet intuitive characterization in a four-dimensional space. Detecting when, throughout training time, and at which layer, the target activation trajectory diverges from the activation trajectory of the source data, allows us to perform early-stopping and improve generalization in a large array of few-shot transfer learning settings, across different algorithms, source and target datasets.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.