Paper detail

Identification of a potential ultra-low Q value electron capture decay branch in $^{75}$Se via a precise Penning trap measurement of the mass of $^{75}$As

Background: Low energy $β$ and electron capture (EC) decays are important systems in neutrino mass determination experiments. An isotope with an ultra-low Q value $β$-decay to an excited state in the daughter with Qes < 1 keV could provide a promising alternative candidate for future experiments. $^{75}$Se EC and $^{75}$Ge $β$-decay represent such candidates, but a more precise determination of the mass of the common daughter, $^{75}$As, is required to evaluate whether their potential decay branches are energetically allowed and ultra-low. Purpose: Perform a precise atomic mass measurement of $^{75}$As and combine the result with the precisely known atomic masses of $^{75}$Se and $^{75}$Ge, along with nuclear energy level data for $^{75}$As to evaluate potential ultra-low Q value decay branches in the EC decay of $^{75}$Se and the $β$-decay of $^{75}$Ge. Method: The LEBIT Penning trap mass spectrometer at the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams was used to perform a high-precision measurement of the atomic mass of $^{75}$As via cyclotron frequency ratio measurements of $^{75}$As$^{+}$ to a $^{12}$C$_{6}^{+}$ reference ion. Results: The $^{75}$As mass excess was determined to be ME($^{75}$As)= -73 035.98(43) keV, from which the ground-state to ground-state Q values for $^{75}$Se EC and $^{75}$Ge $β$-decay were determined to be 866.50(44) keV and 1179.01(44) keV, respectively. These results were compared to energies of excited states in $^{75}$As at 865.4(5) keV and 1172.0(6) keV to determine Q values of 1.1(7) keV and 7.0(7) keV for the potential ultra-low EC and $β$-decay branches of $^{75}$Se and $^{75}$Ge, respectively. Conclusion: The $^{75}$Se EC decay to the 865.4 keV excited state in $^{75}$As is potentially ultra-low with Qes $\approx$ 1 keV. However, a more precise determination of the 865.4(5) keV level in $^{75}$As is required.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.