Paper detail

Explainable Sparse Knowledge Graph Completion via High-order Graph Reasoning Network

Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are becoming increasingly essential infrastructures in many applications while suffering from incompleteness issues. The KG completion task (KGC) automatically predicts missing facts based on an incomplete KG. However, existing methods perform unsatisfactorily in real-world scenarios. On the one hand, their performance will dramatically degrade along with the increasing sparsity of KGs. On the other hand, the inference procedure for prediction is an untrustworthy black box. This paper proposes a novel explainable model for sparse KGC, compositing high-order reasoning into a graph convolutional network, namely HoGRN. It can not only improve the generalization ability to mitigate the information insufficiency issue but also provide interpretability while maintaining the model's effectiveness and efficiency. There are two main components that are seamlessly integrated for joint optimization. First, the high-order reasoning component learns high-quality relation representations by capturing endogenous correlation among relations. This can reflect logical rules to justify a broader of missing facts. Second, the entity updating component leverages a weight-free Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) to efficiently model KG structures with interpretability. Unlike conventional methods, we conduct entity aggregation and design composition-based attention in the relational space without additional parameters. The lightweight design makes HoGRN better suitable for sparse settings. For evaluation, we have conducted extensive experiments-the results of HoGRN on several sparse KGs present impressive improvements (9% MRR gain on average). Further ablation and case studies demonstrate the effectiveness of the main components. Our codes will be released upon acceptance.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.