Paper detail

Estimating Undirected Graphs Under Weak Assumptions

We consider the problem of providing nonparametric confidence guarantees for undirected graphs under weak assumptions. In particular, we do not assume sparsity, incoherence or Normality. We allow the dimension $D$ to increase with the sample size $n$. First, we prove lower bounds that show that if we want accurate inferences with low assumptions then there are limitations on the dimension as a function of sample size. When the dimension increases slowly with sample size, we show that methods based on Normal approximations and on the bootstrap lead to valid inferences and we provide Berry-Esseen bounds on the accuracy of the Normal approximation. When the dimension is large relative to sample size, accurate inferences for graphs under low assumptions are not possible. Instead we propose to estimate something less demanding than the entire partial correlation graph. In particular, we consider: cluster graphs, restricted partial correlation graphs and correlation graphs.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.