Paper detail

CredibleDFGO: Differentiable Factor Graph Optimization with Credibility Supervision

Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) positioning is widely used for urban navigation, but the covariance reported by the GNSS solver is often unreliable in urban canyons. Existing differentiable factor graph optimization (DFGO) methods already learn measurement weighting through the solver, but they still use position-only objectives. As a result, the mean estimate may improve while the reported covariance remains too small, too large, or wrong in shape. In this work, we propose CredibleDFGO (CDFGO), a differentiable GNSS factor graph framework that makes covariance credibility an explicit training target. The Weighting Generation Network (WGN) predicts per-satellite reliability weights. The differentiable Gauss--Newton solver maps these weights to a position estimate and posterior covariance, and proper scoring rules supervise the East--North predictive distribution end-to-end. We study negative log-likelihood (NLL), Energy Score (ES), and their combination. Results on three UrbanNav test scenes show consistent gains in uncertainty credibility. Positioning accuracy also improves on the medium-urban and harsh-urban scenes, and the mean horizontal error and 95th-percentile error improve on the deep-urban scene. On the harsh-urban Mong Kok (MK) scene, CDFGO-Combined reduces the mean horizontal error from 13.77\,m to 11.68\,m, reduces NLL from 40.63 to 6.59, and reduces ES from 12.31 to 9.05. The case studies link the MK improvement to better axis-wise consistency, more credible local covariance ellipses, and satellite-level reweighting.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.