Paper detail

Confidence Intervals for the Number of Components in Factor Analysis and Principal Components Analysis via Subsampling

Factor analysis (FA) and principal component analysis (PCA) are popular statistical methods for summarizing and explaining the variability in multivariate datasets. By default, FA and PCA assume the number of components or factors to be known \emph{a priori}. However, in practice the users first estimate the number of factors or components and then perform FA and PCA analyses using the point estimate. Therefore, in practice the users ignore any uncertainty in the point estimate of the number of factors or components. For datasets where the uncertainty in the point estimate is not ignorable, it is prudent to perform FA and PCA analyses for the range of positive integer values in the confidence intervals for the number of factors or components. We address this problem by proposing a subsampling-based data-intensive approach for estimating confidence intervals for the number of components in FA and PCA. We study the coverage probability of the proposed confidence intervals and provide non-asymptotic theoretical guarantees concerning the accuracy of the confidence intervals. As a byproduct, we derive the first-order \emph{Edgeworth expansion} for spiked eigenvalues of the sample covariance matrix when the data matrix is generated under a factor model. We also demonstrate the usefulness of our approach through numerical simulations and by applying our approach for estimating confidence intervals for the number of factors of the genotyping dataset of the Human Genome Diversity Project.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.