BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Chetkar Jha

Chetkar Jha appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Methodologymath.STStatistics Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Confidence Intervals for the Number of Components in Factor Analysis and Principal Components Analysis via Subsampling

Factor analysis (FA) and principal component analysis (PCA) are popular statistical methods for summarizing and explaining the variability in multivariate datasets. By default, FA and PCA assume the number of components or factors to be known \emph{a priori}. However, in practice the users first estimate the number of factors or components and then perform FA and PCA analyses using the point estimate. Therefore, in practice the users ignore any uncertainty in the point estimate of the number of factors or components. For datasets where the uncertainty in the point estimate is not ignorable, it is prudent to perform FA and PCA analyses for the range of positive integer values in the confidence intervals for the number of factors or components. We address this problem by proposing a subsampling-based data-intensive approach for estimating confidence intervals for the number of components in FA and PCA. We study the coverage probability of the proposed confidence intervals and provide non-asymptotic theoretical guarantees concerning the accuracy of the confidence intervals. As a byproduct, we derive the first-order \emph{Edgeworth expansion} for spiked eigenvalues of the sample covariance matrix when the data matrix is generated under a factor model. We also demonstrate the usefulness of our approach through numerical simulations and by applying our approach for estimating confidence intervals for the number of factors of the genotyping dataset of the Human Genome Diversity Project.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Multiple Hypothesis Testing To Estimate The Number of Communities in Sparse Stochastic Block Models

Network-based clustering methods frequently require the number of communities to be specified \emph{a priori}. Moreover, most of the existing methods for estimating the number of communities assume the number of communities to be fixed and not scale with the network size $n$. The few methods that assume the number of communities to increase with the network size $n$ are only valid when the average degree $d$ of a network grows at least as fast as $O(n)$ (i.e., the dense case) or lies within a narrow range. This presents a challenge in clustering large-scale network data, particularly when the average degree $d$ of a network grows slower than the rate of $O(n)$ (i.e., the sparse case). To address this problem, we proposed a new sequential procedure utilizing multiple hypothesis tests and the spectral properties of Erdös Rényi graphs for estimating the number of communities in sparse stochastic block models (SBMs). We prove the consistency of our method for sparse SBMs for a broad range of the sparsity parameter. As a consequence, we discover that our method can estimate the number of communities $K^{(n)}_{\star}$ with $K^{(n)}_{\star}$ increasing at the rate as high as $O(n^{(1 - 3γ)/(4 - 3γ)})$, where $d = O(n^{1 - γ})$. Moreover, we show that our method can be adapted as a stopping rule in estimating the number of communities in binary tree stochastic block models. We benchmark the performance of our method against other competing methods on six reference single-cell RNA sequencing datasets. Finally, we demonstrate the usefulness of our method through numerical simulations and by using it for clustering real single-cell RNA-sequencing datasets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access