Paper detail

Background evaluations for the chiral magnetic effect with normalized correlators using a multiphase transport model

The chiral magnetic effect (CME) induces an electric charge separation in a chiral medium along the magnetic field that is mostly produced by spectator protons in heavy-ion collisions. The experimental searches for the CME, based on the charge-dependent angular correlations ($γ$), however, have remained inconclusive, because the non-CME background contributions are not well understood. Experimentally, the $γ$ correlators have been measured with respect to the second-order ($Ψ_{2}$) and the third-order ($Ψ_{3}$) symmetry planes, defined as $γ_{112}$ and $γ_{123}$, respectively. The expectation was that with a proper normalization, $γ_{123}$ would provide a data-driven estimate for the background contributions in $γ_{112}$. In this work, we calculate different harmonics of the $γ$ correlators using a charge-conserving version of a multiphase transport (AMPT) model to examine the validity of the said assumption. We find that the pure-background AMPT simulations do not yield an equality in the normalized $γ_{112}$ and $γ_{123}$, quantified by $κ_{112}$ and $κ_{123}$, respectively. Furthermore, we test another correlator, $γ_{132}$, within AMPT, and discuss the relation between different $γ$ correlators.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.