BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Wanbing He

Wanbing He contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
nucl-exhep-exhep-phnucl-thphysics.ins-detphysics.plasm-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Machine learning in nuclear physics at low and intermediate energies

Machine learning is becoming a new paradigm for scientific research in various research fields due to its exciting and powerful capability of modeling tools used for big-data processing task. In this mini-review, we first briefly introduce different methodologies of the machine learning algorithms and techniques. As a snapshot of many applications by machine learning, some selected applications are presented especially for low and intermediate energy nuclear physics, which include topics on theoretical applications in nuclear structure, nuclear reactions, properties of nuclear matter as well as experimental applications in event identification/reconstruction, complex system control and firmware performance. Finally, we also give a brief summary and outlook on the possible directions of using machine learning in low-intermediate energy nuclear physics and possible improvements in ML algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Manipulation of Nuclear Isomers with Lasers: Mechanisms and Prospects

Over one hundred years have passed since the nuclear isomer was first introduced, in analogy with chemical isomers to describe long-lived excited nuclear states. In 1921, Otto Hahn discovered the first nuclear isomer $^{234m}$Pa. After that, step by step, it was realized that different types of nuclear isomers exist, including spin isomer, K isomer, seniority isomers, and ``shape and fission'' isomer. The spin isomer occurs when the spin change $ΔI$ of a transition is very large. The larger $ΔI$, the lower the electromagnetic transition rates, the longer the half-lives. The K-isomer exists due to the significant change in K, where K is the projection of the total angular momentum on the symmetry axis. The seniority isomers arise due to a very small transition probability in seniority conserving transitions around semi-magic nuclei, where the seniority, which corresponds to the number of unpaired nucleons, is a reasonably pure quantum number. For a so-called shape isomer, the inhibition of the decay transition comes from the associated shape changes. It is caused by that a nucleus is trapped in a deformed shape which is its secondary minimum and is hard to decay back to its ground state.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The STAR Event Plane Detector

The Event Plane Detector (EPD) is an upgrade detector to the STAR experiment at RHIC, designed to measure the pattern of forward-going charged particles emitted in a high-energy collision between heavy nuclei. It consists of two highly-segmented disks of 1.2-cm-thick scintillator embedded with wavelength-shifting fiber, coupled to silicon photomultipliers and custom electronics. We describe the general design of the device, its construction, and performance on the bench and in the experiment.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Background evaluations for the chiral magnetic effect with normalized correlators using a multiphase transport model

The chiral magnetic effect (CME) induces an electric charge separation in a chiral medium along the magnetic field that is mostly produced by spectator protons in heavy-ion collisions. The experimental searches for the CME, based on the charge-dependent angular correlations ($γ$), however, have remained inconclusive, because the non-CME background contributions are not well understood. Experimentally, the $γ$ correlators have been measured with respect to the second-order ($Ψ_{2}$) and the third-order ($Ψ_{3}$) symmetry planes, defined as $γ_{112}$ and $γ_{123}$, respectively. The expectation was that with a proper normalization, $γ_{123}$ would provide a data-driven estimate for the background contributions in $γ_{112}$. In this work, we calculate different harmonics of the $γ$ correlators using a charge-conserving version of a multiphase transport (AMPT) model to examine the validity of the said assumption. We find that the pure-background AMPT simulations do not yield an equality in the normalized $γ_{112}$ and $γ_{123}$, quantified by $κ_{112}$ and $κ_{123}$, respectively. Furthermore, we test another correlator, $γ_{132}$, within AMPT, and discuss the relation between different $γ$ correlators.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access