Paper detail

Anomalously small resistivity and thermopower of strongly compensated semiconductors and topological insulators

In the recent paper we explained why the maximum bulk resistivity of topological insulators (TIs)is so small [B. Skinner, T. Chen, and B. I. Shklovskii, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 176801 (2012)]. Using the model of completely compensated semiconductor we showed that when Fermi level is pinned in the middle of the gap the activation energy of resistivity $Δ=0.3 (E_g/2)$, where $E_g$ is the semiconductor gap. In this paper, we consider strongly compensated $n$-type semiconductor. We find position of the Fermi level $μ$ calculated from the bottom of the conduction band and the activation energy of the resistivity $Δ$ as a function of compensation $K$, and show that $Δ= 0.3 (E_c-μ) $ holds at any $1-K \ll 1$. At the same time Peltier energy (heat) $Π$ is even smaller: $Π\simeq 0.5Δ= 0.15(E_c - μ)$. We also show that at low temperatures the activated conductivity crosses over to variable range hopping (VRH) and find the characteristic temperature of VRH, $T_{ES}$, as a function of $1-K$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.