Paper detail

Annotation-free deep learning for detection and segmentation of fetal germinal matrix-intraventricular hemorrhage in brain MRI

Background: Prenatal germinal matrix-intraventricular hemorrhage (GMH-IVH) is a leading cause of infant mortality and neurodevelopmental impairment. Manual diagnosis and lesion segmentation are labor-intensive and error-prone. Deep learning models offer potential for automation but typically require large annotated datasets, which are challenging to obtain. Purpose: To develop and validate an annotation-free deep learning framework for automated detection and segmentation of GMH-IVH on brain MRI. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 2D T2-weighted MRI data from pregnant women collected from October 2015 to October 2023 at one hospital (internal validation) and two hospitals (external validation). Eligible participants included healthy fetuses and those with GMH-IVH. FreeHemoSeg was developed and trained using pseudo GMH-IVH images synthesized from normal fetal data guided by medical priors. Primary outcomes included diagnostic accuracy (area under the ROC curve [AUROC], sensitivity, specificity) and segmentation accuracy (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC]). A reader study evaluated clinical utility. Results: A total of 1674 stacks from 558 pregnant women were analyzed. FreeHemoSeg achieved the highest performance in both internal (sensitivity: 0.914, 95% CI 0.869-0.945; specificity: 0.966, 95% CI 0.946-0.978; DSC: 0.559, 95% CI 0.546-0.571) and external validation (sensitivity: 0.824, 95% CI 0.739-0.885; specificity: 0.943, 95% CI 0.913-0.964; DSC: 0.512, 95% CI 0.497-0.526), outperforming supervised and unsupervised methods. FreeHemoSeg assistance improved radiologists' sensitivity (from 0.882 to 0.941-1.000) and diagnostic confidence while reducing interpretation time by 16.0-52.7%. Conclusion: FreeHemoSeg accurately detects and localizes fetal brain hemorrhages without annotated training data, enabling earlier diagnosis and supporting timely clinical management.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.