Paper detail

A structural evaluation of the tungsten isotopes via thermal neutron capture

Total radiative thermal neutron-capture $γ$-ray cross sections for the $^{182,183,184,186}$W isotopes were measured using guided neutron beams from the Budapest Research Reactor to induce prompt and delayed $γ$ rays from elemental and isotopically-enriched tungsten targets. These cross sections were determined from the sum of measured $γ$-ray cross sections feeding the ground state from low-lying levels below a cutoff energy, E$_{\rm crit}$, where the level scheme is completely known, and continuum $γ$ rays from levels above E$_{\rm crit}$, calculated using the Monte Carlo statistical-decay code DICEBOX. The new cross sections determined in this work for the tungsten nuclides are: $σ_{0}(^{182}{\rm W}) = 20.5(14)$ b and $σ_{11/2^{+}}(^{183}{\rm W}^{m}, 5.2 {\rm s}) = 0.177(18)$ b; $σ_{0}(^{183}{\rm W}) = 9.37(38)$ b and $σ_{5^{-}}(^{184}{\rm W}^{m}, 8.33 μ{\rm s}) = 0.0247(55)$ b; $σ_{0}(^{184}{\rm W}) = 1.43(10)$ b and $σ_{11/2^{+}}(^{185}{\rm W}^{m}, 1.67 {\rm min}) = 0.0062(16)$ b; and, $σ_{0}(^{186}{\rm W}) = 33.33(62)$ b and $σ_{9/2^{+}}(^{187}{\rm W}^{m}, 1.38 μ{\rm s}) = 0.400(16)$ b. These results are consistent with earlier measurements in the literature. The $^{186}$W cross section was also independently confirmed from an activation measurement, following the decay of $^{187}$W, yielding values for $σ_{0}(^{186}{\rm W})$ that are consistent with our prompt $γ$-ray measurement. The cross-section measurements were found to be insensitive to choice of level density or photon strength model, and only weakly dependent on E$_{\rm crit}$. Total radiative-capture widths calculated with DICEBOX showed much greater model dependence, however, the recommended values could be reproduced with selected model choices. The decay schemes for all tungsten isotopes were improved in these analyses.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.