BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Zur Luria

Zur Luria contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.COmath.PR

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

On the maximum number of Latin transversals

Let $T(n)$ denote the maximal number of transversals in an order-$n$ Latin square. Improving on the bounds obtained by McKay et al., Taranenko recently proved that $T(n) \leq \left((1+o(1))\frac{n}{e^2}\right)^{n}$, and conjectured that this bound is tight. We prove via a probabilistic construction that indeed $T(n) = \left((1+o(1))\frac{n}{e^2}\right)^{n}$. Until the present paper, no superexponential lower bound for $T(n)$ was known. We also give a simpler proof of the upper bound.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Random Steiner systems and bounded degree coboundary expanders of every dimension

We introduce a new model of random $d$-dimensional simplicial complexes, for $d\geq 2$, whose $(d-1)$-cells have bounded degrees. We show that with high probability, complexes sampled according to this model are coboundary expanders. The construction relies on Keevash's recent result on designs [Ke14], and the proof of the expansion uses techniques developed by Evra and Kaufman in [EK15]. This gives a full solution to a question raised in [DK12], which was solved in the two-dimensional case by Lubotzky and Meshulam [LM13].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

An upper bound on the number of high-dimensional permutations

What is the higher-dimensional analog of a permutation? If we think of a permutation as given by a permutation matrix, then the following definition suggests itself: A d-dimensional permutation of order n is an [n]^(d+1) array of zeros and ones in which every "line" contains a unique 1 entry. A line here is a set of entries of the form {(x_1,...,x_{i-1},y,x_{i+1},...,x_{d+1})}, for y between 1 and n, some index i between 1 and d+1 and some choice of x_j in [n] for all j except i. It is easy to observe that a one-dimensional permutation is simply a permutation matrix and that a two-dimensional permutation is synonymous with an order-n Latin square. We seek an estimate for the number of d-dimensional permutations. Our main result is the following upper bound on their number: ((1+o(1))(n/e^d))^(n^d). We tend to believe that this is actually the correct number, but the problem of proving the complementary lower bound remains open. Our main tool is an adaptation of Bregman's proof of the Minc conjecture on permanents. More concretely, our approach is very close in spirit to Radhakrishnan's proof of Bregman's theorem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

On the vertices of the d-dimensional Birkhoff polytope

Consider the Birkhoff polytope of n by n doubly-stochastic matrices. As the Birkhoff-von Neumann theorem famously states, its vertex set coincides with the set of all n by n permutation matrices. Here we seek a higher-dimensional analog of this basic fact. Namely, consider the polytope which consists of all tristochastic arrays of order n. These are n by n by n arrays with nonnegative entries in which every line sums to 1. What can be said about its vertex set? It is well-known that an order-n Latin square may be viewed as a tristochastic array where every line contains n-1 zeros and a single 1 entry. Indeed, every Latin square of order n is a vertex, but as we show, such vertices constitute only a vanishingly small part of the total number of vertices. More concretely, we show that the number of vertices is at least (L_n)^{3/2-o(1)}, where L_n is the number of order-n Latin squares. We also briefly consider similar problems concerning the polytope of n by n by n arrays where the entries in every coordinate hyperplane sum to 1. Several open questions are presented as well.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

An approximation algorithm for counting contingency tables

We present a randomized approximation algorithm for counting contingency tables, mxn non-negative integer matrices with given row sums R=(r_1, ..., r_m) and column sums C=(c_1, ..., c_n). We define smooth margins (R,C) in terms of the typical table and prove that for such margins the algorithm has quasi-polynomial N^{O(ln N)} complexity, where N=r_1+...+r_m=c_1+...+c_n. Various classes of margins are smooth, e.g., when m=O(n), n=O(m) and the ratios between the largest and the smallest row sums as well as between the largest and the smallest column sums are strictly smaller than the golden ratio (1+sqrt{5})/2 = 1.618. The algorithm builds on Monte Carlo integration and sampling algorithms for log-concave densities, the matrix scaling algorithm, the permanent approximation algorithm, and an integral representation for the number of contingency tables.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access