Chernoff's Inequality - A very elementary proof
We give a very simple proof of a strengthened version of Chernoff's Inequality. We derive the same conclusion from much weaker assumptions.
Discover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
Nathan Linial contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
We give a very simple proof of a strengthened version of Chernoff's Inequality. We derive the same conclusion from much weaker assumptions.
What is the higher-dimensional analog of a permutation? If we think of a permutation as given by a permutation matrix, then the following definition suggests itself: A d-dimensional permutation of order n is an [n]^(d+1) array of zeros and ones in which every "line" contains a unique 1 entry. A line here is a set of entries of the form {(x_1,...,x_{i-1},y,x_{i+1},...,x_{d+1})}, for y between 1 and n, some index i between 1 and d+1 and some choice of x_j in [n] for all j except i. It is easy to observe that a one-dimensional permutation is simply a permutation matrix and that a two-dimensional permutation is synonymous with an order-n Latin square. We seek an estimate for the number of d-dimensional permutations. Our main result is the following upper bound on their number: ((1+o(1))(n/e^d))^(n^d). We tend to believe that this is actually the correct number, but the problem of proving the complementary lower bound remains open. Our main tool is an adaptation of Bregman's proof of the Minc conjecture on permanents. More concretely, our approach is very close in spirit to Radhakrishnan's proof of Bregman's theorem.
Consider the Birkhoff polytope of n by n doubly-stochastic matrices. As the Birkhoff-von Neumann theorem famously states, its vertex set coincides with the set of all n by n permutation matrices. Here we seek a higher-dimensional analog of this basic fact. Namely, consider the polytope which consists of all tristochastic arrays of order n. These are n by n by n arrays with nonnegative entries in which every line sums to 1. What can be said about its vertex set? It is well-known that an order-n Latin square may be viewed as a tristochastic array where every line contains n-1 zeros and a single 1 entry. Indeed, every Latin square of order n is a vertex, but as we show, such vertices constitute only a vanishingly small part of the total number of vertices. More concretely, we show that the number of vertices is at least (L_n)^{3/2-o(1)}, where L_n is the number of order-n Latin squares. We also briefly consider similar problems concerning the polytope of n by n by n arrays where the entries in every coordinate hyperplane sum to 1. Several open questions are presented as well.
In this paper we study a new product of graphs called {\em tight product}. A graph $H$ is said to be a tight product of two (undirected multi) graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$, if $V(H)=V(G_1)\times V(G_2)$ and both projection maps $V(H)\to V(G_1)$ and $V(H)\to V(G_2)$ are covering maps. It is not a priori clear when two given graphs have a tight product (in fact, it is $NP$-hard to decide). We investigate the conditions under which this is possible. This perspective yields a new characterization of class-1 $(2k+1)$-regular graphs. We also obtain a new model of random $d$-regular graphs whose second eigenvalue is almost surely at most $O(d^{3/4})$. This construction resembles random graph lifts, but requires fewer random bits.
Let STS(n) denote the number of Steiner triple systems on n vertices, and let F(n) denote the number of 1-factorizations of the complete graph on n vertices. We prove the following upper bound. STS(n) <= ((1 + o(1)) (n/e^2))^(n^2/6) F(n) <= ((1 + o(1)) (n/e^2))^(n^2/2) We conjecture that the bound is sharp. Our main tool is the entropy method.
We view the RSK correspondence as associating to each permutation $π\in S_n$ a Young diagram $λ=λ(π)$, i.e. a partition of $n$. Suppose now that $π$ is left-multiplied by $t$ transpositions, what is the largest number of cells in $λ$ that can change as a result? It is natural refer to this question as the search for the Lipschitz constant of the RSK correspondence. We show upper bounds on this Lipschitz constant as a function of $t$. For $t=1$, we give a construction of permutations that achieve this bound exactly. For larger $t$ we construct permutations which come close to matching the upper bound that we prove.
The main question studied in this article may be viewed as a nonlinear analogue of Dvoretzky's theorem in Banach space theory or as part of Ramsey theory in combinatorics. Given a finite metric space on n points, we seek its subspace of largest cardinality which can be embedded with a given distortion in Hilbert space. We provide nearly tight upper and lower bounds on the cardinality of this subspace in terms of n and the desired distortion. Our main theorem states that for any epsilon>0, every n point metric space contains a subset of size at least n^{1-ε} which is embeddable in Hilbert space with O(\frac{\log(1/ε)}ε) distortion. The bound on the distortion is tight up to the log(1/ε) factor. We further include a comprehensive study of various other aspects of this problem.