BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Zengyou He

Zengyou He contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Quantitative MethodsApplicationsComputational Engineering, Finance, and ScienceData Structures and AlgorithmsGenomicsDatabasesMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

A Combinatorial Perspective of the Protein Inference Problem

In a shotgun proteomics experiment, proteins are the most biologically meaningful output. The success of proteomics studies depends on the ability to accurately and efficiently identify proteins. Many methods have been proposed to facilitate the identification of proteins from the results of peptide identification. However, the relationship between protein identification and peptide identification has not been thoroughly explained before. In this paper, we are devoted to a combinatorial perspective of the protein inference problem. We employ combinatorial mathematics to calculate the conditional protein probabilities (Protein probability means the probability that a protein is correctly identified) under three assumptions, which lead to a lower bound, an upper bound and an empirical estimation of protein probabilities, respectively. The combinatorial perspective enables us to obtain a closed-form formulation for protein inference. Based on our model, we study the impact of unique peptides and degenerate peptides on protein probabilities. Here, degenerate peptides are peptides shared by at least two proteins. Meanwhile, we also study the relationship of our model with other methods such as ProteinProphet. A probability confidence interval can be calculated and used together with probability to filter the protein identification result. Our method achieves competitive results with ProteinProphet in a more efficient manner in the experiment based on two datasets of standard protein mixtures and two datasets of real samples. We name our program ProteinInfer. Its Java source code is available at http://bioinformatics.ust.hk/proteininfer

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

On unbiased performance evaluation for protein inference

This letter is a response to the comments of Serang (2012) on Huang and He (2012) in Bioinformatics. Serang (2012) claimed that the parameters for the Fido algorithm should be specified using the grid search method in Serang et al. (2010) so as to generate a deserved accuracy in performance comparison. It seems that it is an argument on parameter tuning. However, it is indeed the issue of how to conduct an unbiased performance evaluation for comparing different protein inference algorithms. In this letter, we would explain why we don't use the grid search for parameter selection in Huang and He (2012) and show that this procedure may result in an over-estimated performance that is unfair to competing algorithms. In fact, this issue has also been pointed out by Li and Radivojac (2012).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Protein Inference and Protein Quantification: Two Sides of the Same Coin

Motivation: In mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics, protein quantification and protein identification are two major computational problems. To quantify the protein abundance, a list of proteins must be firstly inferred from the sample. Then the relative or absolute protein abundance is estimated with quantification methods, such as spectral counting. Until now, researchers have been dealing with these two processes separately. In fact, they are two sides of same coin in the sense that truly present proteins are those proteins with non-zero abundances. Then, one interesting question is if we regard the protein inference problem as a special protein quantification problem, is it possible to achieve better protein inference performance? Contribution: In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of using protein quantification methods to solve the protein inference problem. Protein inference is to determine whether each candidate protein is present in the sample or not. Protein quantification is to calculate the abundance of each protein. Naturally, the absent proteins should have zero abundances. Thus, we argue that the protein inference problem can be viewed as a special case of protein quantification problem: present proteins are those proteins with non-zero abundances. Based on this idea, our paper tries to use three very simple protein quantification methods to solve the protein inference problem effectively. Results: The experimental results on six datasets show that these three methods are competitive with previous protein inference algorithms. This demonstrates that it is plausible to take the protein inference problem as a special case of protein quantification, which opens the door of devising more effective protein inference algorithms from a quantification perspective.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Running PeptideProphet Separately on Replicates Improves Peptide Identification Results

Limited spectrum coverage is a problem in shotgun proteomics. Replicates are generated to improve the spectrum coverage. When integrating peptide identification results obtained from replicates, the state-of-the-art algorithm PeptideProphet combines Peptide-Spectrum Matches (PSMs) before building the statistical model to calculate peptide probabilities. In this paper, we find the connection between merging results of replicates and Bagging, which is a standard routine to improve the power of statistical methods. Following Bagging's philosophy, we propose to run PeptideProphet separately on each replicate and combine the outputs to obtain the final peptide probabilities. In our experiments, we show that the proposed routine can improve PeptideProphet consistently on a standard protein dataset, a Human dataset and a Yeast dataset.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Efficient K-Nearest Neighbor Join Algorithms for High Dimensional Sparse Data

The K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) join is an expensive but important operation in many data mining algorithms. Several recent applications need to perform KNN join for high dimensional sparse data. Unfortunately, all existing KNN join algorithms are designed for low dimensional data. To fulfill this void, we investigate the KNN join problem for high dimensional sparse data. In this paper, we propose three KNN join algorithms: a brute force (BF) algorithm, an inverted index-based(IIB) algorithm and an improved inverted index-based(IIIB) algorithm. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets were conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithms for high dimensional sparse data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Stable Feature Selection for Biomarker Discovery

Feature selection techniques have been used as the workhorse in biomarker discovery applications for a long time. Surprisingly, the stability of feature selection with respect to sampling variations has long been under-considered. It is only until recently that this issue has received more and more attention. In this article, we review existing stable feature selection methods for biomarker discovery using a generic hierarchal framework. We have two objectives: (1) providing an overview on this new yet fast growing topic for a convenient reference; (2) categorizing existing methods under an expandable framework for future research and development.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access