BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Peijun Zhu

Peijun Zhu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Quantitative MethodsApplicationsComputational Engineering, Finance, and ScienceData Structures and AlgorithmsMachine Learningquant-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Half-width of local spectral density of states given by width of nonperturbative parts of eigenfunctions: The Wigner-band-matrix model

It is shown that, for a Hamiltonian with a band structure, the half width of local spectral density of states, or strength function, is closely related to the width of the nonperturbative (NPT) parts of energy eigenfunctions. In the Wigner-band random-matrix model, making use of a generalized Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theory, we derive analytical expressions for the width of the NPT parts under weak and strong perturbation. An iterative algorithm is given, by which the NPT widths can be computed efficiently, and is used in numerical test of the analytical predictions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

On unbiased performance evaluation for protein inference

This letter is a response to the comments of Serang (2012) on Huang and He (2012) in Bioinformatics. Serang (2012) claimed that the parameters for the Fido algorithm should be specified using the grid search method in Serang et al. (2010) so as to generate a deserved accuracy in performance comparison. It seems that it is an argument on parameter tuning. However, it is indeed the issue of how to conduct an unbiased performance evaluation for comparing different protein inference algorithms. In this letter, we would explain why we don't use the grid search for parameter selection in Huang and He (2012) and show that this procedure may result in an over-estimated performance that is unfair to competing algorithms. In fact, this issue has also been pointed out by Li and Radivojac (2012).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Protein Inference and Protein Quantification: Two Sides of the Same Coin

Motivation: In mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics, protein quantification and protein identification are two major computational problems. To quantify the protein abundance, a list of proteins must be firstly inferred from the sample. Then the relative or absolute protein abundance is estimated with quantification methods, such as spectral counting. Until now, researchers have been dealing with these two processes separately. In fact, they are two sides of same coin in the sense that truly present proteins are those proteins with non-zero abundances. Then, one interesting question is if we regard the protein inference problem as a special protein quantification problem, is it possible to achieve better protein inference performance? Contribution: In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of using protein quantification methods to solve the protein inference problem. Protein inference is to determine whether each candidate protein is present in the sample or not. Protein quantification is to calculate the abundance of each protein. Naturally, the absent proteins should have zero abundances. Thus, we argue that the protein inference problem can be viewed as a special case of protein quantification problem: present proteins are those proteins with non-zero abundances. Based on this idea, our paper tries to use three very simple protein quantification methods to solve the protein inference problem effectively. Results: The experimental results on six datasets show that these three methods are competitive with previous protein inference algorithms. This demonstrates that it is plausible to take the protein inference problem as a special case of protein quantification, which opens the door of devising more effective protein inference algorithms from a quantification perspective.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access