Paper detail

A Combinatorial Perspective of the Protein Inference Problem

In a shotgun proteomics experiment, proteins are the most biologically meaningful output. The success of proteomics studies depends on the ability to accurately and efficiently identify proteins. Many methods have been proposed to facilitate the identification of proteins from the results of peptide identification. However, the relationship between protein identification and peptide identification has not been thoroughly explained before. In this paper, we are devoted to a combinatorial perspective of the protein inference problem. We employ combinatorial mathematics to calculate the conditional protein probabilities (Protein probability means the probability that a protein is correctly identified) under three assumptions, which lead to a lower bound, an upper bound and an empirical estimation of protein probabilities, respectively. The combinatorial perspective enables us to obtain a closed-form formulation for protein inference. Based on our model, we study the impact of unique peptides and degenerate peptides on protein probabilities. Here, degenerate peptides are peptides shared by at least two proteins. Meanwhile, we also study the relationship of our model with other methods such as ProteinProphet. A probability confidence interval can be calculated and used together with probability to filter the protein identification result. Our method achieves competitive results with ProteinProphet in a more efficient manner in the experiment based on two datasets of standard protein mixtures and two datasets of real samples. We name our program ProteinInfer. Its Java source code is available at http://bioinformatics.ust.hk/proteininfer

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.