BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Zahra Taheri

Zahra Taheri contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational ComplexityFormal Languages and Automata Theorymath.AC

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Stone type representations and dualities by power set ring

In this paper, it is shown that the Boolean ring of a commutative ring is isomorphic to the ring of clopens of its prime spectrum. In particular, Stone's Representation Theorem is generalized. The prime spectrum of the Boolean ring of a given ring $R$ is identified with the Pierce spectrum of $R$. The discreteness of prime spectra is characterized. It is also proved that the space of connected components of a compact space $X$ is isomorphic to the prime spectrum of the ring of clopens of $X$. As another major result, it is shown that a morphism of rings between complete Boolean rings preserves suprema if and only if the induced map between the corresponding prime spectra is an open map.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

How much could we cover a set by c.e sets?

"How much c.e. sets could cover a given set?" in this paper we are going to answer this question. Also, in this approach some old concepts come into a new arrangement. The major goal of this article is to introduce an appropriate definition for this purpose. Introduction In Computability Theory (Recursion Theory) in the first step we wish to recognize the sets which could be enumerated by Turing machines (equivalently, algorithms) and in the next step we will compare these sets by some reasonable order (Like Turing degree). Also sometimes with some extra information (Oracles) a class of non c.e. sets show the same behavior as c.e. sets (Post hierarchy and related theorems). Here we try another approach: "Let A be an arbitrary set and we wish to recognize how much this set might be covered by a c.e. set?" Although in some sense this approach could be seen in some definitions of Recursion Theory, but at the best of our knowledge it didn't considered as an approach yet, even though it is able to shed a light on some subjects of Computability of sets. Defining this approach is not quite straightforward and there are some obstacles to define them. To overcome these difficulties we modify the definitions. We have an alternative problem here when we consider recursive sets and not c.e. sets. In this case, the problem would be: "Let A be an arbitrary set and we wish to know that how much this set might be covered by a recursive Set?" Here, we try the first definition and the first problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access