Paper detail

Kaplansky's zero divisor and unit conjectures on elements with supports of size $3$

Kaplansky's zero divisor conjecture (unit conjecture, respectively) states that for a torsion-free group $G$ and a field $\mathbb{F}$, the group ring $\mathbb{F}[G]$ has no zero divisors (has no unit with support of size greater than $1$). In this paper, we study possible zero divisors and units in $\mathbb{F}[G]$ whose supports have size $3$. For any field $\mathbb{F}$ and all torsion-free groups $G$, we prove that if $αβ=0$ for some non-zero $α, β\in \mathbb{F}[G]$ such that $|supp(α)|=3$, then $|supp(β)|\geq 10$. If $\mathbb{F}=\mathbb{F}_2$ is the field with 2 elements, the latter result can be improved so that $|supp(β)|\geq 20$. This improves a result in [J. Group Theory, 16 (2013), no. 5, 667-693]. Concerning the unit conjecture, we prove that if $αβ=1$ for some $α, β\in \mathbb{F}[G]$ such that $|supp(α)|=3$, then $|supp(β)|\geq 9$. The latter improves a part of a result in [Exp. Math., 24 (2015), 326-338] to arbitrary fields.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.