Source author record

Zachiri McKenzie

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

8works
2topics
4close collaborators

Published work

8 publications

preprint2022arXiv

End extending models of set theory via power admissible covers

Motivated by problems involving end extensions of models of set theory, we develop the rudiments of the power admissible cover construction (over ill-founded models of set theory), an extension of the machinery of admissible covers invented by Barwise as a versatile tool for generalizing model-theoretic results about countable well-founded models of set theory to countable ill-founded ones. Our development of the power admissible machinery allows us to obtain new results concerning powerset-preserving end extensions and rank extensions of countable models of subsystems of ZFC\mathsf{ZFC}. The canonical extension KPP\mathsf{KP}^\mathcal{P} of Kripke-Platek set theory KP\mathsf{KP} plays a key role in our work; one of our results refines a theorem of Rathjen by showing that Σ1P-FoundationΣ_1^\mathcal{P}\text{-}\mathsf{Foundation} is provable in KPP\mathsf{KP}^\mathcal{P} (without invoking the axiom of choice).

preprint2022arXiv

Partially-elementary end extensions of countable admissible sets

A result of Kaufmann shows that if LαL_α is countable, admissible and satisfies Πn-CollectionΠ_n\textsf{-Collection}, then ⟨Lα,∈⟩\langle L_α, \in \rangle has a proper Σn+1Σ_{n+1}-elementary end extension. This paper investigates to what extent the theory that holds in ⟨Lα,∈⟩\langle L_α, \in \rangle can be transferred to the partially-elementary end extensions guaranteed by Kaufmann's result. We show that there are LαL_α satisfying full separation, powerset and Πn-CollectionΠ_n\textsf{-Collection} that have no proper Σn+1Σ_{n+1}-elementary end extension satisfying either Πn-CollectionΠ_{n}\textsf{-Collection} or Πn+3-FoundationΠ_{n+3}\textsf{-Foundation}. In contrast, we show that if AA is a countable admissible set that satisfies Πn-CollectionΠ_n\textsf{-Collection} and TT is a recursively enumerable theory that holds in ⟨A,∈⟩\langle A, \in \rangle, then ⟨A,∈⟩\langle A, \in \rangle has a proper ΣnΣ_n-elementary end extension that satisfies TT.

preprint2022arXiv

The subset relation and 22-stratified sentences in set theory and class theory

Hamkins and Kikuchi (2016 and 2017) show that in both set theory and class theory the definable subset ordering of the universe interprets a complete and decidable theory. If M\mathcal{M} is a model of set theory, then ⟨M,⊆M⟩\langle M, \subseteq^\mathcal{M} \rangle is an atomic unbounded relatively complemented distributive lattice. If M\mathcal{M} is model of class theory, then ⟨M,⊆M⟩\langle M, \subseteq^\mathcal{M} \rangle is an infinite atomic boolean algebra. We identify the minimal subsystem of ZF\mathrm{ZF}, BAS\mathrm{BAS}, that ensures that the definable subset relation is an atomic unbounded relatively complemented distributive lattice and classify the atomic unbounded relatively complemented distributive lattices that can be realised as a subset relations of this theory. The fact that the theory of atomic unbounded relatively complemented distributive lattices is complete is used to show that BAS\mathrm{BAS} decides every 22-stratified sentence of set theory. We also identify the minimal subsystem of NBG\mathrm{NBG}, BAC\mathrm{BAC}, that ensures that the definable subset relation is an infinite atomic Boolean algebra. We show that there is a complete extension, IABAIdeal\mathrm{IABA}_\mathrm{Ideal}, of the theory of infinite atomic boolean algebras and an extension BAC+\mathrm{BAC}^+ of BAC\mathrm{BAC} corresponding to the minimal theory such that if M\mathcal{M} is a model of BAC+\mathrm{BAC}^+, then ⟨M,SM,⊆M⟩\langle M, \mathcal{S}^\mathcal{M}, \subseteq^\mathcal{M} \rangle is a model of IABAIdeal\mathrm{IABA}_{\mathrm{Ideal}}, where SM\mathcal{S}^\mathcal{M} is a unary predicate that distinguishes sets from classes. This is used to show that BAC+\mathrm{BAC}^+, a subsystem of NBG\mathrm{NBG}, decides every 22-sentence in the language of class theory that includes a unary predicate distinguishing sets from classes.

preprint2016arXiv

XX-torsion and universal groups

For a set X⊆NX\subseteq \mathbb{N}, we define the XX-torsion of a group GG to be all elements g∈Gg\in G with gn=eg^{n}=e for some n∈Xn\in X. With XX recursively enumerable, we give two independent proofs (group-theoretic, and model-theoretic) that there exists a universal finitely presented XX-torsion-free group; one which contains all finitely presented XX-torsion-free groups. We also show that, if XX is recursively enumerable, then the set of finite presentations of XX-torsion-free groups is Π20Π_{2}^{0}-complete in Kleene's arithmetic hierarchy.

preprint2016arXiv

Feferman's Forays into the Foundations of Category Theory

This paper is primarily concerned with assessing a set-theoretical system, S∗S^*, for the foundations of category theory suggested by Solomon Feferman. S∗S^* is an extension of NFU, and may be seen as an attempt to accommodate unrestricted categories such as the category of all groups (without any small/large restrictions), while still obtaining the benefits of ZFC on part of the domain. A substantial part of the paper is devoted to establishing an improved upper bound on the consistency strength of S∗S^*. The assessment of S∗S^* as a foundation of category theory is framed by the following general desiderata (R) and (S). (R) asks for the unrestricted existence of the category of all groups, the category of all categories, the category of all functors between two categories, etc., along with natural implementability of ordinary mathematics and category theory. (S) asks for a certain relative distinction between large and small sets, and the requirement that they both enjoy the full benefits of the ZFC\mathrm{ZFC} axioms. S∗S^* satisfies (R) simply because it is an extension of NFU. By means of a recursive construction utilizing the notion of strongly cantorian sets, we argue that it also satisfies (S). Moreover, this construction yields a lower bound on the consistency strength of S∗S^*. We also exhibit a basic positive result for category theory internal to NFU that provides motivation for studying NFU-based foundations of category theory.

preprint2016arXiv

Largest initial segments pointwise fixed by automorphisms of models of set theory

Given a model M\mathcal{M} of set theory, and a nontrivial automorphism jj of M\mathcal{M}, let Ifix(j)\mathcal{I}_{\mathrm{fix}}(j) be the submodel of M\mathcal{M} whose universe consists of elements mm of M\mathcal{M} such that j(x)=xj(x)=x for every xx in the transitive closure of mm (where the transitive closure of mm is computed within M\mathcal{M}). Here we study the class C\mathcal{C} of structures of the form Ifix(j)\mathcal{I}_{\mathrm{fix}}(j), where the ambient model M\mathcal{M} satisfies a frugal yet robust fragment of ZFC\mathrm{ZFC} known as MOST\mathrm{MOST}, and j(m)=mj(m)=m whenever mm is a finite ordinal in the sense of M\mathcal{M}. We show that every structure in C\mathcal{C} satisfies MOST+Δ0P-Collection\mathrm{MOST}+Δ_0^\mathcal{P}\textrm{-Collection}. We also show that the following countable structures are in C\mathcal{C}: (a) transitive models of MOST+Δ0P-Collection\mathrm{MOST}+Δ_0^\mathcal{P}\textrm{-Collection}, (b) recursively saturated models of MOST+Δ0P-Collection\mathrm{MOST}+Δ_0^\mathcal{P}\textrm{-Collection}, (c) models of ZFC\mathrm{ZFC}. It follows from (b) that the theory of C\mathcal{C} is precisely MOST+Δ0P\mathrm{MOST+Δ}_{0}^{\mathcal{P}}-Collection. We conclude by proving a refinement of a result due to Amir Togha.

preprint2016arXiv

On the strength of a weak variant of the Axiom of Counting

In this paper NFU−AC\mathrm{NFU}^{-\mathrm{AC}} is used to denote Ronald Jensen's modification of Quine's `New Foundations' Set Theory (NF\mathrm{NF}) fortified with a type-level pairing function but without the Axiom of Choice. The axiom AxCount≥\mathrm{AxCount}_\geq is the variant of the Axiom of Counting which asserts that no finite set is smaller than its own set of singletons. This paper shows that NFU−AC+AxCount≥\mathrm{NFU}^{-\mathrm{AC}}+\mathrm{AxCount}_\geq proves the consistency of the Simple Theory of Types with Infinity (TSTI\mathrm{TSTI}). This result implies that NF+AxCount≥\mathrm{NF}+\mathrm{AxCount}_\geq proves that consistency of TSTI\mathrm{TSTI}, and that NFU−AC+AxCount≥\mathrm{NFU}^{-\mathrm{AC}}+\mathrm{AxCount}_\geq proves the consistency of NFU−AC\mathrm{NFU}^{-\mathrm{AC}}.

preprint2013arXiv

Automorphisms of models of set theory and extensions of NFU

In this paper we exploit the structural properties of standard and non-standard models of set theory to produce models of set theory admitting automorphisms that are well-behaved along an initial segment of their ordinals. NFU\mathrm{NFU} is Ronald Jensen's modifcation of Quine's `New Foundations' set theory that allows non-sets into the domain of discourse. The axioms AxCount\mathrm{AxCount}, AxCount≤\mathrm{AxCount}_\leq and AxCount≥\mathrm{AxCount}_\geq each extend NFU\mathrm{NFU} by placing restrictions on the cardinality of a finite set of singletons relative to the cardinality of its union. Using the results about automorphisms of models of set theory we separate the consistency strengths of these three extensions of NFU\mathrm{NFU}. We show that NFU+AxCount\mathrm{NFU} + \mathrm{AxCount} proves the consistency of NFU+AxCount≤\mathrm{NFU} + \mathrm{AxCount}_\leq, and NFU+AxCount≤\mathrm{NFU} + \mathrm{AxCount}_\leq proves the consistency of NFU+AxCount≥\mathrm{NFU} + \mathrm{AxCount}_\geq.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.