Source author record

Yannick Mogge

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.CO

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works

1topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2020arXiv

Random perturbation of sparse graphs

In the model of randomly perturbed graphs we consider the union of a deterministic graph $\mathcal{G}_α$ with minimum degree $αn$ and the binomial random graph $\mathbb{G}(n,p)$ . This model was introduced by Bohman, Frieze, and Martin and for Hamilton cycles their result bridges the gap between Dirac's theorem and the results by Posá and Koršunov on the threshold in $\mathbb{G}(n,p)$ . In this note we extend this result in $\mathcal{G}_α\cup \mathbb{G}(n,p)$ to sparser graphs with $α=o(1)$ . More precisely, for any $\varepsilon>0$ and $α\colon \mathbb{N} \mapsto (0,1)$ we show that a.a.s. $\mathcal{G}_α\cup \mathbb{G}(n,β/n)$ is Hamiltonian, where $β= -(6 + \varepsilon) \log(α)$ . If $α>0$ is a fixed constant this gives the aforementioned result by Bohman, Frieze, and Martin and if $α=O(1/n)$ the random part $\mathbb{G}(n,p)$ is sufficient for a Hamilton cycle. We also discuss embeddings of bounded degree trees and other spanning structures in this model, which lead to interesting questions on almost spanning embeddings into $\mathbb{G}(n,p)$ .

preprint2019arXiv

Connector-Breaker games on random boards

By now, the Maker-Breaker connectivity game on a complete graph $K_n$ or on a random graph $G\sim G_{n,p}$ is well studied. Recently, London and Pluhár suggested a variant in which Maker always needs to choose her edges in such a way that her graph stays connected. By their results it follows that for this connected version of the game, the threshold bias on $K_n$ and the threshold probability on $G\sim G_{n,p}$ for winning the game drastically differ from the corresponding values for the usual Maker-Breaker version, assuming Maker's bias to be $1$ . However, they observed that the threshold biases of both versions played on $K_n$ are still of the same order if instead Maker is allowed to claim two edges in every round. Naturally, this made London and Pluhár ask whether a similar phenomenon can be observed when a $(2:2)$ game is played on $G_{n,p}$ . We prove that this is not the case, and determine the threshold probability for winning this game to be of size $n^{-2/3+o(1)}$ .

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.