Source author record

Dennis Clemens

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

15works
2topics
4close collaborators

Published work

15 publications

preprint2022arXiv

Ramsey equivalence for asymmetric pairs of graphs

A graph FF is Ramsey for a pair of graphs (G,H)(G,H) if any red/blue-coloring of the edges of FF yields a copy of GG with all edges colored red or a copy of HH with all edges colored blue. Two pairs of graphs are called Ramsey equivalent if they have the same collection of Ramsey graphs. The symmetric setting, that is, the case G=HG=H, received considerable attention. This led to the open question whether there are connected graphs GG and G′G' such that (G,G)(G,G) and (G′,G′)(G',G') are Ramsey equivalent. We make progress on the asymmetric version of this question and identify several non-trivial families of Ramsey equivalent pairs of connected graphs. Certain pairs of stars provide a first, albeit trivial, example of Ramsey equivalent pairs of connected graphs. Our first result characterizes all Ramsey equivalent pairs of stars. The rest of the paper focuses on pairs of the form (T,Kt)(T,K_t), where TT is a tree and KtK_t is a complete graph. We show that, if TT belongs to a certain family of trees, including all non-trivial stars, then (T,Kt)(T,K_t) is Ramsey equivalent to a family of pairs of the form (T,H)(T,H), where HH is obtained from KtK_t by attaching disjoint smaller cliques to some of its vertices. In addition, we establish that for (T,H)(T,H) to be Ramsey equivalent to (T,Kt)(T,K_t), HH must have roughly this form. On the other hand, we prove that for many other trees TT, including all odd-diameter trees, (T,Kt)(T,K_t) is not equivalent to any such pair, not even to the pair (T,Kt⋅K2)(T, K_t\cdot K_2), where Kt⋅K2K_t\cdot K_2 is a complete graph KtK_t with a single edge attached.

preprint2022arXiv

The tree packing conjecture for trees of almost linear maximum degree

We prove that there is c>0c>0 such that for all sufficiently large nn, if T1,…,TnT_1,\dots,T_n are any trees such that TiT_i has ii vertices and maximum degree at most cn/log⁡ncn/\log n, then {T1,…,Tn}\{T_1,\dots,T_n\} packs into KnK_n. Our main result actually allows to replace the host graph KnK_n by an arbitrary quasirandom graph, and to generalize from trees to graphs of bounded degeneracy that are rich in bare paths, contain some odd degree vertices, and only satisfy much less stringent restrictions on their number of vertices.

preprint2020arXiv

Minimal Ramsey graphs with many vertices of small degree

Given any graph HH, a graph GG is said to be qq-Ramsey for HH if every coloring of the edges of GG with qq colors yields a monochromatic subgraph isomorphic to HH. Further, such a graph GG is said to be minimal qq-Ramsey for HH if additionally no proper subgraph G′G' of GG is qq-Ramsey for HH. In 1976, Burr, Erdős, and Lovász initiated the study of the parameter sq(H)s_q(H), defined as the smallest minimum degree among all minimal qq-Ramsey graphs for HH. In this paper, we consider the problem of determining how many vertices of degree sq(H)s_q(H) a minimal qq-Ramsey graph for HH can contain. Specifically, we seek to identify graphs for which a minimal qq-Ramsey graph can contain arbitrarily many such vertices. We call a graph satisfying this property sqs_q-abundant. Among other results, we prove that every cycle is sqs_q-abundant for any integer q≥2q\geq 2. We also discuss the cases when HH is a clique or a clique with a pendant edge, extending previous results of Burr et al. and Fox et al. To prove our results and construct suitable minimal Ramsey graphs, we develop certain new gadget graphs, called pattern gadgets, which generalize and extend earlier constructions that have proven useful in the study of minimal Ramsey graphs. These new gadgets might be of independent interest.

preprint2020arXiv

On minimal Ramsey graphs and Ramsey equivalence in multiple colours

For an integer q≥2q\ge 2, a graph GG is called qq-Ramsey for a graph HH if every qq-colouring of the edges of GG contains a monochromatic copy of HH. If GG is qq-Ramsey for HH, yet no proper subgraph of GG has this property then GG is called qq-Ramsey-minimal for HH. Generalising a statement by Burr, Nešetřil and Rödl from 1977 we prove that, for q≥3q\ge 3, if GG is a graph that is not qq-Ramsey for some graph HH then GG is contained as an induced subgraph in an infinite number of qq-Ramsey-minimal graphs for HH, as long as HH is 33-connected or isomorphic to the triangle. For such HH, the following are some consequences. (1) For 2≤r<q2\le r< q, every rr-Ramsey-minimal graph for HH is contained as an induced subgraph in an infinite number of qq-Ramsey-minimal graphs for HH. (2) For every q≥3q\ge 3, there are qq-Ramsey-minimal graphs for HH of arbitrarily large maximum degree, genus, and chromatic number. (3) The collection {Mq(H):H is 3-connected or K3}\{{\cal M}_q(H) : H \text{ is 3-connected or } K_3\} forms an antichain with respect to the subset relation, where Mq(H){\cal M}_q(H) denotes the set of all graphs that are qq-Ramsey-minimal for HH. We also address the question which pairs of graphs satisfy Mq(H1)=Mq(H2){\cal M}_q(H_1)={\cal M}_q(H_2), in which case H1H_1 and H2H_2 are called qq-equivalent. We show that two graphs H1H_1 and H2H_2 are qq-equivalent for even qq if they are 22-equivalent, and that in general qq-equivalence for some q≥3q\ge 3 does not necessarily imply 22-equivalence. Finally we indicate that for connected graphs this implication may hold: Results by Nešetřil and Rödl and by Fox, Grinshpun, Liebenau, Person and Szabó imply that the complete graph is not 22-equivalent to any other connected graph. We prove that this is the case for an arbitrary number of colours.

preprint2019arXiv

Connector-Breaker games on random boards

By now, the Maker-Breaker connectivity game on a complete graph KnK_n or on a random graph G∼Gn,pG\sim G_{n,p} is well studied. Recently, London and Pluhár suggested a variant in which Maker always needs to choose her edges in such a way that her graph stays connected. By their results it follows that for this connected version of the game, the threshold bias on KnK_n and the threshold probability on G∼Gn,pG\sim G_{n,p} for winning the game drastically differ from the corresponding values for the usual Maker-Breaker version, assuming Maker's bias to be 11. However, they observed that the threshold biases of both versions played on KnK_n are still of the same order if instead Maker is allowed to claim two edges in every round. Naturally, this made London and Pluhár ask whether a similar phenomenon can be observed when a (2:2)(2:2) game is played on Gn,pG_{n,p}. We prove that this is not the case, and determine the threshold probability for winning this game to be of size n−2/3+o(1)n^{-2/3+o(1)}.

preprint2016arXiv

A non-trivial upper bound on the threshold bias of the Oriented-cycle game

In the Oriented-cycle game, introduced by Bollobás and Szabó, two players, called OMaker and OBreaker, alternately direct edges of KnK_n. OMaker directs exactly one edge, whereas OBreaker is allowed to direct between one and bb edges. OMaker wins if the final tournament contains a directed cycle, otherwise OBreaker wins. Bollobás and Szabó conjectured that for a bias as large as n−3n-3 OMaker has a winning strategy if OBreaker must take exactly bb edges in each round. It was shown recently by Ben-Eliezer, Krivelevich and Sudakov, that OMaker has a winning strategy for this game whenever b≤n2−2b\leq \frac{n}{2}-2. In this paper, we show that OBreaker has a winning strategy whenever b≥5n6+2b\geq \frac{5n}{6}+2. Moreover, in case OBreaker is required to direct exactly bb edges in each move, we show that OBreaker wins for b≥19n20b\geq \frac{19n}{20}, provided that nn is large enough. This refutes the conjecture by Bollobás and Szabó.

preprint2016arXiv

Creating cycles in Walker-Breaker games

We consider biased (1:b)(1:b) Walker-Breaker games: Walker and Breaker alternately claim edges of the complete graph KnK_n, Walker taking one edge and Breaker claiming bb edges in each round, with the constraint that Walker needs to choose her edges according to a walk. As questioned in a paper by Espig, Frieze, Krivelevich and Pegden, we study how long a cycle Walker is able to create and for which biases bb Walker has a chance to create a cycle of given constant length.

preprint2015arXiv

A remark on the Tournament game

We study the Maker-Breaker tournament game played on the edge set of a given graph GG. Two players, Maker and Breaker claim unclaimed edges of GG in turns, and Maker wins if by the end of the game she claims all the edges of a pre-defined goal tournament. Given a tournament TkT_k on kk vertices, we determine the threshold bias for the (1:b)(1:b) TkT_k-tournament game on KnK_n. We also look at the (1:1)(1:1) TkT_k-tournament game played on the edge set of a random graph Gn,p{\mathcal{G}_{n,p}} and determine the threshold probability for Maker's win. We compare these games with the clique game and discuss whether a random graph intuition is satisfied.

preprint2015arXiv

An improved bound on the sizes of matchings guaranteeing a rainbow matching

A conjecture by Aharoni and Berger states that every family of nn matchings of size n+1n+1 in a bipartite multigraph contains a rainbow matching of size nn. In this paper we prove that matching sizes of (3/2+o(1))n(3/2 + o(1)) n suffice to guarantee such a rainbow matching, which is asymptotically the same bound as the best known one in case we only aim to find a rainbow matching of size n−1n-1. This improves previous results by Aharoni, Charbit and Howard, and Kotlar and Ziv.

preprint2015arXiv

Minimum degrees and codegrees of minimal Ramsey 3-uniform hypergraphs

A uniform hypergraph HH is called kk-Ramsey for a hypergraph FF, if no matter how one colors the edges of HH with kk colors, there is always a monochromatic copy of FF. We say that HH is minimal kk-Ramsey for FF, if HH is kk-Ramsey for FF but every proper subhypergraph of HH is not. Burr, Erdős and Lovasz studied various parameters of minimal Ramsey graphs. In this paper we initiate the study of minimum degrees and codegrees of minimal Ramsey 33-uniform hypergraphs. We show that the smallest minimum vertex degree over all minimal kk-Ramsey 33-uniform hypergraphs for Kt(3)K_t^{(3)} is exponential in some polynomial in kk and tt. We also study the smallest possible minimum codegrees over minimal 22-Ramsey 33-uniform hypergraphs.

preprint2015arXiv

On sets not belonging to algebras and rainbow matchings in graphs

Motivated by a question of Grinblat, we study the minimal number v(n)\mathfrak{v}(n) that satisfies the following. If A1,…,AnA_1,\ldots, A_n are equivalence relations on a set XX such that for every i∈[n]i\in[n] there are at least v(n)\mathfrak{v}(n) elements whose equivalence classes with respect to AiA_i are nontrivial, then A1,…,AnA_1, \ldots, A_n contain a rainbow matching, i.e. there exist 2n2n distinct elements x1,y1,…,xn,yn∈Xx_1,y_1,\ldots,x_n,y_n\in X with xi∼Aiyix_i\sim_{A_i} y_i for each i∈[n]i\in [n]. Grinblat asked whether v(n)=3n−2\mathfrak{v}(n) = 3n-2 for every n≥4n\geq 4. The best-known upper bound was v(n)≤16n/5+O(1)\mathfrak{v}(n) \leq 16n/5 + \mathcal{O}(1) due to Nivash and Omri. Transferring the problem into the setting of edge-coloured multigraphs, we affirm Grinblat's question asymptotically, i.e. we show that v(n)=3n+o(n)\mathfrak{v}(n) = 3n+o(n).

preprint2014arXiv

Keeping Avoider's graph almost acyclic

We consider biased (1:b)(1:b) Avoider-Enforcer games in the monotone and strict versions. In particular, we show that Avoider can keep his graph being a forest for every but maybe the last round of the game if b≥200nln⁡nb \geq 200 n \ln n. By this we obtain essentially optimal upper bounds on the threshold biases for the non-planarity game, the non-kk-colorability game, and the KtK_t-minor game thus addressing a question and improving the results of Hefetz, Krivelevich, Stojaković, and Szabó. Moreover, we give a slight improvement for the lower bound in the non-planarity game.

preprint2013arXiv

Building spanning trees quickly in Maker-Breaker games

For a tree T on n vertices, we study the Maker-Breaker game, played on the edge set of the complete graph on n vertices, which Maker wins as soon as the graph she builds contains a copy of T. We prove that if T has bounded maximum degree, then Maker can win this game within n+1 moves. Moreover, we prove that Maker can build almost every tree on n vertices in n-1 moves and provide non-trivial examples of families of trees which Maker cannot build in n-1 moves.

preprint2012arXiv

Fast strategies in Maker-Breaker games played on random boards

In this paper we analyze classical Maker-Breaker games played on the edge set of a sparse random board $G\sim \gnp$. We consider the Hamiltonicity game, the perfect matching game and the kk-connectivity game. We prove that for p(n)≥polylog(n)/np(n)\geq \text{polylog}(n)/n, the board $G\sim \gnp$ is typically such that Maker can win these games asymptotically as fast as possible, i.e. within n+o(n)n+o(n), n/2+o(n)n/2+o(n) and kn/2+o(n)kn/2+o(n) moves respectively.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.