Paper detail

Random perturbation of sparse graphs

In the model of randomly perturbed graphs we consider the union of a deterministic graph $\mathcal{G}_α$ with minimum degree $αn$ and the binomial random graph $\mathbb{G}(n,p)$. This model was introduced by Bohman, Frieze, and Martin and for Hamilton cycles their result bridges the gap between Dirac's theorem and the results by Posá and Koršunov on the threshold in $\mathbb{G}(n,p)$. In this note we extend this result in $\mathcal{G}_α\cup \mathbb{G}(n,p)$ to sparser graphs with $α=o(1)$. More precisely, for any $\varepsilon>0$ and $α\colon \mathbb{N} \mapsto (0,1)$ we show that a.a.s. $\mathcal{G}_α\cup \mathbb{G}(n,β/n)$ is Hamiltonian, where $β= -(6 + \varepsilon) \log(α)$. If $α>0$ is a fixed constant this gives the aforementioned result by Bohman, Frieze, and Martin and if $α=O(1/n)$ the random part $\mathbb{G}(n,p)$ is sufficient for a Hamilton cycle. We also discuss embeddings of bounded degree trees and other spanning structures in this model, which lead to interesting questions on almost spanning embeddings into $\mathbb{G}(n,p)$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.