Abstract

By now, the Maker-Breaker connectivity game on a complete graph KnK_n or on a random graph G∼Gn,pG\sim G_{n,p} is well studied. Recently, London and Pluhár suggested a variant in which Maker always needs to choose her edges in such a way that her graph stays connected. By their results it follows that for this connected version of the game, the threshold bias on KnK_n and the threshold probability on G∼Gn,pG\sim G_{n,p} for winning the game drastically differ from the corresponding values for the usual Maker-Breaker version, assuming Maker's bias to be 11. However, they observed that the threshold biases of both versions played on KnK_n are still of the same order if instead Maker is allowed to claim two edges in every round. Naturally, this made London and Pluhár ask whether a similar phenomenon can be observed when a (2:2)(2:2) game is played on Gn,pG_{n,p}. We prove that this is not the case, and determine the threshold probability for winning this game to be of size n−2/3+o(1)n^{-2/3+o(1)}.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.