Source author record

Xu-Dong Huang

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

6works
1topics
4close collaborators

Published work

6 publications

preprint2026arXiv

Two loop QCD corrections to e+e−→J/ψ+ηce^+ e^- \to J/ψ+ η_c in asymptotic expansion

Within the framework of NRQCD, the short-distance coefficients (SDCs) for the process e+e−→J/ψ+ηce^+e^-\to J/ψ+η_c have been obtained up to NNLO in asymptotic expansions over r=16mc2/sr={16m_c^2}/{s} up to r15r^{15}. Although these asymptotic expressions are deviated from the full results near the threshold r=1r= 1, they provide excellent approximations to the full results for r<0.8r<0.8, with deviations less than 3%3\%. Therefore, these asymptotic expressions offer reliable applications for phenomenological predictions across a wide range of center-of-mass energies s\sqrt{s}. Utilizing these asymptotic expressions, we present phenomenological predictions for the cross sections in both the on-shell mass scheme and the MS‾\overline{\rm MS} mass scheme, with the uncertainty arising from the renormalization scale μRμ_R included. The μRμ_R uncertainty for predictions from the MS‾\overline{\rm MS} mass scheme is slightly larger than that from the on-shell mass scheme, which is partly attributed to the helicity flip in the process e+e−→J/ψ+ηce^+e^-\to J/ψ+η_c. We observe that both mass schemes yield quite similar predictions, and our theoretical results are consistent with the available experimental data.

preprint2022arXiv

Novel and self-consistency analysis of the QCD running coupling αs(Q)α_s(Q) in both the perturbative and nonperturbative domains

The QCD coupling αsα_s is the most important parameter for achieving precise QCD predictions. By using the well measured effective coupling αsg1(Q)α^{g_1}_{s}(Q) defined from the Bjorken sum rules as a basis, we suggest a novel and self-consistency way to fix the αsα_s at all scales: The QCD light-front holographic model is adopted for its infrared behavior, and the fixed-order pQCD prediction under the principle of maximum conformality (PMC) is used for its high-energy behavior. Using the PMC scheme-and-scale independent perturbative series, and by transforming it into the one under the physical VV-scheme, we observe that a precise αsα_s running behavior in both the perturbative and nonperturbative domains with a smooth transition from small to large scales can be achieved.

preprint2020arXiv

Determination of the top-quark MS‾\overline{\rm MS} running mass via its perturbative relation to the on-shell mass with the help of principle of maximum conformality

In the paper, we study the properties of the top-quark MS‾\overline{\rm MS} running mass computed from its on-shell mass by using both the four-loop MS‾\overline{\rm MS}-on-shell relation and the principle of maximum conformality (PMC) scale-setting approach. The PMC adopts the renormalization group equation to set the correct magnitude of the strong running coupling of the perturbative series, its prediction avoids the conventional renormalization scale ambiguity, and thus a more precise pQCD prediction can be achieved. After applying the PMC to the four-loop MS‾\overline{\rm MS}-on-shell relation and taking the top-quark on-shell mass Mt=172.9±0.4M_t=172.9\pm0.4 GeV as an input, we obtain the renormalization scale-invariant MS‾\overline{\rm MS} running mass at the scale mtm_t, e.g., mt(mt)≃162.6±0.4m_t(m_t)\simeq 162.6\pm 0.4 GeV, in which the error is the squared average of those from Δαs(MZ)Δα_s(M_Z), ΔMtΔM_t, and the approximate error from the uncalculated five-loop terms predicted by using the Padé approximation approach.

preprint2020arXiv

Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to the production of BcB_c and Bc∗B_c^* through W+W^+-boson decays

In this paper, we calculate the total decay widths for the W+W^+-boson decays, W+→Bc+b+sˉ+XW^+ \to B_c+b+\bar{s}+X and W+→Bc∗+b+sˉ+XW^+ \to B^*_c+b+\bar{s}+X, up to next-to-leading order (NLO) accuracy within the framework of the nonrelativistic QCD theory. Both the fixed-order and the fragmentation approaches are adopted to do the calculation. Differential decay widths dΓ/dzdΓ/dz and dΓ/ds1dΓ/ds_1 are also given. We find that the NLO corrections are significant in those two W+W^+ decay channels. Our numerical results show that at the LHC, there are about 7.03×1047.03\times 10^4 BcB_c-meson events and 5.10×1045.10\times 10^4 Bc∗B^*_c-meson events to be produced via the W+W^+-boson decays per operation year.

preprint2020arXiv

Scale-Fixed Predictions for γ+ηcγ+ η_c production in electron-positron collisions at NNLO in perturbative QCD

In the paper, we present QCD predictions for ηc+γη_{c} + γ production at an electron-position collider up to next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) accuracy without renormalization scale ambiguities. The NNLO total cross-section for e++e−→γ+ηce^{+}+e^{-}\toγ+η_{c} using the conventional scale-setting approach has large renormalization scale ambiguities, usually estimated by choosing the renormalization scale to be the e+e−e^+ e^- center-of-mass collision energy s\sqrt{s}. The Principle of Maximum Conformality (PMC) provides a systematic way to eliminate such renormalization scale ambiguities by summing the nonconformal ββ contributions into the QCD coupling αs(Q2)α_s(Q^2). The renormalization group equation then sets the value of αsα_s for the process. The PMC renormalization scale reflects the virtuality of the underlying process, and the resulting predictions satisfy all of the requirements of renormalization group invariance, including renormalization scheme invariance. After applying the PMC, we obtain a scale-and-scheme independent prediction, σ∣NNLO,PMC≃41.18σ|_{\rm NNLO, PMC}\simeq 41.18 fb for s\sqrt{s}=10.6 GeV. The resulting pQCD series matches the series for conformal theory and thus has no divergent renormalon contributions. The large KK factor which contributes to this process reinforces the importance of uncalculated NNNLO and higher-order terms. Using the PMC scale-and-scheme independent conformal series and the Padeˊ\rm Pad\acute{e} approximation approach, we predict σ∣NNNLO,PMC+Pade≃21.36σ|_{\rm NNNLO, PMC+Pade} \simeq 21.36 fb, which is consistent with the recent BELLE measurement σobsσ^{\rm obs}=16.58−9.93+10.5116.58^{+10.51}_{-9.93} fb at s≃10.6\sqrt{s} \simeq 10.6 GeV. This procedure also provides a first estimate of the NNNLO contribution.

preprint2020arXiv

The heavy quarkonium inclusive decays using the principle of maximum conformality

The next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) pQCD correction to the inclusive decays of the heavy quarkonium ηQη_Q (QQ being cc or bb) has been done in the literature within the framework of nonrelativistic QCD. One may observe that the NNLO decay width still has large conventional renormalization scale dependence due to its weaker pQCD convergence, e.g. about (−34%+4%)(^{+4\%}_{-34\%}) for ηcη_c and (−9%+0.0)(^{+0.0}_{-9\%}) for ηbη_b, by varying the scale within the range of [mQ,4mQ][m_Q, 4m_Q]. The principle of maximum conformality (PMC) provides a systematic way to fix the αsα_s-running behavior of the process, which satisfies the requirements of renormalization group invariance and eliminates the conventional renormalization scheme and scale ambiguities. Using the PMC single-scale method, we show that the resultant PMC conformal series is renormalization scale independent, and the precision of the ηQη_Q inclusive decay width can be greatly improved. Taking the relativistic correction O(αsv2)\mathcal{O}(α_{s}v^2) into consideration, the ratios of the ηQη_{Q} decays to light hadrons or γγγγ are: RηcNNLO∣PMC=(3.93−0.24+0.26)×103R^{\rm NNLO}_{η_c}|_{\rm{PMC}}=(3.93^{+0.26}_{-0.24})\times10^3 and RηbNNLO∣PMC=(22.85−0.87+0.90)×103R^{\rm NNLO}_{η_b}|_{\rm{PMC}}=(22.85^{+0.90}_{-0.87})\times10^3, respectively. Here the errors are for Δαs(MZ)=±0.0011Δα_s(M_Z) = \pm0.0011. As a step forward, by applying the Padeˊ\acute{e} approximation approach (PAA) over the PMC conformal series, we obtain approximate NNNLO predictions for those two ratios, e.g. RηcNNNLO∣PAA+PMC=(5.66−0.55+0.65)×103R^{\rm NNNLO}_{η_c}|_{\rm{PAA+PMC}} =(5.66^{+0.65}_{-0.55})\times10^3 and RηbNNNLO∣PAA+PMC=(26.02−1.17+1.24)×103R^{\rm NNNLO}_{η_b}|_{\rm{PAA+PMC}}=(26.02^{+1.24}_{-1.17})\times10^3. The RηcNNNLO∣PAA+PMCR^{\rm NNNLO}_{η_c}|_{\rm{PAA+PMC}} ratio agrees with the latest PDG value Rηcexp=(5.3−1.4+2.4)×103R_{η_c}^{\rm{exp}}=(5.3_{-1.4}^{+2.4})\times10^3, indicating the necessity of a strict calculation of NNNLO terms.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.