Source author record

Huai-Min Yu

Huai-Min Yu appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Scale-Fixed Predictions for $γ+ η_c$ production in electron-positron collisions at NNLO in perturbative QCD

In the paper, we present QCD predictions for $η_{c} + γ$ production at an electron-position collider up to next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) accuracy without renormalization scale ambiguities. The NNLO total cross-section for $e^{+}+e^{-}\toγ+η_{c}$ using the conventional scale-setting approach has large renormalization scale ambiguities, usually estimated by choosing the renormalization scale to be the $e^+ e^-$ center-of-mass collision energy $\sqrt{s}$. The Principle of Maximum Conformality (PMC) provides a systematic way to eliminate such renormalization scale ambiguities by summing the nonconformal $β$ contributions into the QCD coupling $α_s(Q^2)$. The renormalization group equation then sets the value of $α_s$ for the process. The PMC renormalization scale reflects the virtuality of the underlying process, and the resulting predictions satisfy all of the requirements of renormalization group invariance, including renormalization scheme invariance. After applying the PMC, we obtain a scale-and-scheme independent prediction, $σ|_{\rm NNLO, PMC}\simeq 41.18$ fb for $\sqrt{s}$=10.6 GeV. The resulting pQCD series matches the series for conformal theory and thus has no divergent renormalon contributions. The large $K$ factor which contributes to this process reinforces the importance of uncalculated NNNLO and higher-order terms. Using the PMC scale-and-scheme independent conformal series and the $\rm Pad\acute{e}$ approximation approach, we predict $σ|_{\rm NNNLO, PMC+Pade} \simeq 21.36$ fb, which is consistent with the recent BELLE measurement $σ^{\rm obs}$=$16.58^{+10.51}_{-9.93}$ fb at $\sqrt{s} \simeq 10.6$ GeV. This procedure also provides a first estimate of the NNNLO contribution.

preprint2020arXiv

The heavy quarkonium inclusive decays using the principle of maximum conformality

The next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) pQCD correction to the inclusive decays of the heavy quarkonium $η_Q$ ($Q$ being $c$ or $b$) has been done in the literature within the framework of nonrelativistic QCD. One may observe that the NNLO decay width still has large conventional renormalization scale dependence due to its weaker pQCD convergence, e.g. about $(^{+4\%}_{-34\%})$ for $η_c$ and $(^{+0.0}_{-9\%})$ for $η_b$, by varying the scale within the range of $[m_Q, 4m_Q]$. The principle of maximum conformality (PMC) provides a systematic way to fix the $α_s$-running behavior of the process, which satisfies the requirements of renormalization group invariance and eliminates the conventional renormalization scheme and scale ambiguities. Using the PMC single-scale method, we show that the resultant PMC conformal series is renormalization scale independent, and the precision of the $η_Q$ inclusive decay width can be greatly improved. Taking the relativistic correction $\mathcal{O}(α_{s}v^2)$ into consideration, the ratios of the $η_{Q}$ decays to light hadrons or $γγ$ are: $R^{\rm NNLO}_{η_c}|_{\rm{PMC}}=(3.93^{+0.26}_{-0.24})\times10^3$ and $R^{\rm NNLO}_{η_b}|_{\rm{PMC}}=(22.85^{+0.90}_{-0.87})\times10^3$, respectively. Here the errors are for $Δα_s(M_Z) = \pm0.0011$. As a step forward, by applying the Pad$\acute{e}$ approximation approach (PAA) over the PMC conformal series, we obtain approximate NNNLO predictions for those two ratios, e.g. $R^{\rm NNNLO}_{η_c}|_{\rm{PAA+PMC}} =(5.66^{+0.65}_{-0.55})\times10^3$ and $R^{\rm NNNLO}_{η_b}|_{\rm{PAA+PMC}}=(26.02^{+1.24}_{-1.17})\times10^3$. The $R^{\rm NNNLO}_{η_c}|_{\rm{PAA+PMC}}$ ratio agrees with the latest PDG value $R_{η_c}^{\rm{exp}}=(5.3_{-1.4}^{+2.4})\times10^3$, indicating the necessity of a strict calculation of NNNLO terms.