Paper detail

Two loop QCD corrections to $e^+ e^- \to J/ψ+ η_c$ in asymptotic expansion

Within the framework of NRQCD, the short-distance coefficients (SDCs) for the process $e^+e^-\to J/ψ+η_c$ have been obtained up to NNLO in asymptotic expansions over $r={16m_c^2}/{s}$ up to $r^{15}$. Although these asymptotic expressions are deviated from the full results near the threshold $r= 1$, they provide excellent approximations to the full results for $r<0.8$, with deviations less than $3\%$. Therefore, these asymptotic expressions offer reliable applications for phenomenological predictions across a wide range of center-of-mass energies $\sqrt{s}$. Utilizing these asymptotic expressions, we present phenomenological predictions for the cross sections in both the on-shell mass scheme and the $\overline{\rm MS}$ mass scheme, with the uncertainty arising from the renormalization scale $μ_R$ included. The $μ_R$ uncertainty for predictions from the $\overline{\rm MS}$ mass scheme is slightly larger than that from the on-shell mass scheme, which is partly attributed to the helicity flip in the process $e^+e^-\to J/ψ+η_c$. We observe that both mass schemes yield quite similar predictions, and our theoretical results are consistent with the available experimental data.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.