Source author record

Wolfgang Trutschnig

Wolfgang Trutschnig appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.ST Statistics Theory eess.SY Machine Learning physics.ins-det Systems and Control

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

6topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

On a multivariate copula-based dependence measure and its estimation

Working with so-called linkages allows to define a copula-based, $[0,1]$-valued multivariate dependence measure $ζ^1(\boldsymbol{X},Y)$ quantifying the scale-invariant extent of dependence of a random variable $Y$ on a $d$-dimensional random vector $\boldsymbol{X}=(X_1,\ldots,X_d)$ which exhibits various good and natural properties. In particular, $ζ^1(\boldsymbol{X},Y)=0$ if and only if $\boldsymbol{X}$ and $Y$ are independent, $ζ^1(\boldsymbol{X},Y)$ is maximal exclusively if $Y$ is a function of $\boldsymbol{X}$, and ignoring one or several coordinates of $\boldsymbol{X}$ can not increase the resulting dependence value. After introducing and analyzing the metric $D_1$ underlying the construction of the dependence measure and deriving examples showing how much information can be lost by only considering all pairwise dependence values $ζ^1(X_1,Y),\ldots,ζ^1(X_d,Y)$ we derive a so-called checkerboard estimator for $ζ^1(\boldsymbol{X},Y)$ and show that it is strongly consistent in full generality, i.e., without any smoothness restrictions on the underlying copula. Some simulations illustrating the small sample performance of the estimator complement the established theoretical results.

preprint2022arXiv

Race Driver Evaluation at a Driving Simulator using a physical Model and a Machine Learning Approach

Professional race drivers are still superior to automated systems at controlling a vehicle at its dynamic limit. Gaining insight into race drivers' vehicle handling process might lead to further development in the areas of automated driving systems. We present a method to study and evaluate race drivers on a driver-in-the-loop simulator by analysing tire grip potential exploitation. Given initial data from a simulator run, two optimiser based on physical models maximise the horizontal vehicle acceleration or the tire forces, respectively. An overall performance score, a vehicle-trajectory score and a handling score are introduced to evaluate drivers. Our method is thereby completely track independent and can be used from one single corner up to a large data set. We apply the proposed method to a motorsport data set containing over 1200 laps from seven professional race drivers and two amateur drivers whose lap times are 10-20% slower. The difference to the professional drivers comes mainly from their inferior handling skills and not their choice of driving line. A downside of the presented method for certain applications is an extensive computation time. Therefore, we propose a Long-short-term memory (LSTM) neural network to estimate the driver evaluation scores. We show that the neural network is accurate and robust with a root-mean-square error between 2-5% and can replace the optimisation based method. The time for processing the data set considered in this work is reduced from 68 hours to 12 seconds, making the neural network suitable for real-time application.

preprint2021arXiv

How simplifying and flexible is the simplifying assumption in pair-copula constructions -- analytic answers in dimension three and a glimpse beyond

Motivated by the increasing popularity and the seemingly broad applicability of pair-copula constructions underlined by numerous publications in the last decade, in this contribution we tackle the unavoidable question on how flexible and simplifying the commonly used `simplifying assumption' is from an analytic perspective and provide answers to two related open questions posed by Nagler and Czado in 2016. Aiming at a simplest possible setup for deriving the main results we first focus on the three-dimensional setting. We prove that the family of simplified copulas is flexible in the sense that it is dense in the set of all three-dimensional co\-pulas with respect to the uniform metric $d_\infty$ - considering stronger notions of convergence like the one induced by the metric $D_1$, by weak conditional convergence, by total variation, or by Kullback-Leibler divergence, however, the family even turn out to be nowhere dense and hence insufficient for any kind of flexible approximation. Furthermore, returning to $d_\infty$ we show that the partial vine copula is never the optimal simplified copula approximation of a given, non-simplified copula $C$, and derive examples illustrating that the corresponding approximation error can be strikingly large and extend to more than 28\% of the diameter of the metric space. Moreover, the mapping $ψ$ assigning each three-dimensional copula its unique partial vine copula turns out to be discontinuous with respect to $d_\infty$ (but continuous with respect to $D_1$ and to weak conditional convergence), implying a surprising sensitivity of partial vine copula approximations. The afore-mentioned main results concerning $d_\infty$ are then extended to the general multivariate setting.

preprint2015arXiv

Why GPS makes distances bigger than they are

Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), such as the Global Positioning System (GPS), are among the most important sensors for movement analysis. GPS is widely used to record the trajectories of vehicles, animals and human beings. However, all GPS movement data are affected by both measurement and interpolation error. In this article we show that measurement error causes a systematic bias in distances recorded with a GPS: the distance between two points recorded with a GPS is -- on average -- bigger than the true distance between these points. This systematic `overestimation of distance' becomes relevant if the influence of interpolation error can be neglected, which is the case for movement sampled at high frequencies. We provide a mathematical explanation of this phenomenon and we illustrate that it functionally depends on the autocorrelation of GPS measurement error ($C$). We argue that $C$ can be interpreted as a quality measure for movement data recorded with a GPS. If there is strong autocorrelation any two consecutive position estimates have very similar error. This error cancels out when average speed, distance or direction are calculated along the trajectory. Based on our theoretical findings we introduce a novel approach to determine $C$ in real-world GPS movement data sampled at high frequencies. We apply our approach to a set of pedestrian and a set of car trajectories. We find that the measurement error in the data is strongly spatially and temporally autocorrelated and give a quality estimate of the data. Finally, we want to emphasize that all our findings are not limited to GPS alone. The systematic bias and all its implications are bound to occur in any movement data collected with absolute positioning if interpolation error can be neglected.